%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR027+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:57 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.36s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.36s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 30 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 63 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 6 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 8 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 30 ( 0 sgn 17 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query127,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> ( tptpcol_16_31868(X15)
& tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query127) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( genlmt(X21,X22)
& mtvisible(X21) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_7347,axiom,
! [X15] :
( isa(X15,c_tptpcol_16_31868)
=> tptpcol_16_31868(X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7347) ).
fof(ax2_406,axiom,
! [X7] :
( ( isa(X7,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt) )
=> tptp_8_875(X7,f_relationallexistsfn(X7,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_406) ).
fof(ax2_1808,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2610_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1808) ).
fof(ax2_407,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt)
=> relationallexists(c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_407) ).
fof(ax2_1377,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1377) ).
fof(ax2_2981,axiom,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ( relationallexists(X9,X8,X10)
& isa(X7,X8) )
=> isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X7,X9,X8,X10),X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2981) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt)
=> ( tptpcol_16_31868(X15)
& tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X15) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query127]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X32,X33] :
( mtvisible(X33)
| ~ genlmt(X32,X33)
| ~ mtvisible(X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
! [X23] :
( ( ~ tptpcol_16_31868(X23)
| ~ tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X23) )
& mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X24] :
( tptpcol_16_31868(X24)
| ~ isa(X24,c_tptpcol_16_31868) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7347])])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X26] :
( tptp_8_875(X26,f_relationallexistsfn(X26,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868))
| ~ isa(X26,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_406])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt,c_tptp_member2610_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1808]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindlecollectormt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_31868(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_31868)
| tptpcol_16_31868(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent))
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt)
| tptp_8_875(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
( relationallexists(c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_407])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
( ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_31868)
| ~ tptp_8_875(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent))
| tptp_8_875(X1,f_relationallexistsfn(X1,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1377]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X34,X35,X36,X37] :
( isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X34,X36,X35,X37),X37)
| ~ relationallexists(X36,X35,X37)
| ~ isa(X34,X35) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_2981])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_member2610_mt)
| relationallexists(c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationallexistsfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefnunitvectorintervaldirectionoftranslation_throughoutmovement_translationevent_786,c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868),c_tptpcol_16_31868),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ relationallexists(X3,X2,X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| isa(f_relationallexistsfn(X1,X3,X2,X4),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
relationallexists(c_tptp_8_875,f_subcollectionofwithrelationfromtypefn(c_unitvectorinterval,c_directionoftranslation_throughout,c_movement_translationevent),c_tptpcol_16_31868),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28]),c_0_23])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR027+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:24:42 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.36/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.36/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % new_bool_3 with pid 3072331 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.61 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.36/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.36/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.61 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.61 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3072334 completed with status 0
% 0.36/0.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.36/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.36/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.36/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.36/0.61 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM32-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.61 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.36/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.36/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.36/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.36/0.61
% 0.36/0.61 % Proof found!
% 0.36/0.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.36/0.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.36/0.62 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.36/0.62 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7922
% 0.36/0.62 % Initial clauses : 85
% 0.36/0.62 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 0.36/0.62 % Processed clauses : 104
% 0.36/0.62 % ...of these trivial : 6
% 0.36/0.62 % ...subsumed : 20
% 0.36/0.62 % ...remaining for further processing : 78
% 0.36/0.62 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Generated clauses : 38
% 0.36/0.62 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 0.36/0.62 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Paramodulations : 38
% 0.36/0.62 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % NegExts : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Total rewrite steps : 22
% 0.36/0.62 % ...of those cached : 9
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.36/0.62 % Current number of processed clauses : 78
% 0.36/0.62 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 31
% 0.36/0.62 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.36/0.62 % Non-unit-clauses : 46
% 0.36/0.62 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.36/0.62 % ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.36/0.62 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 494
% 0.36/0.62 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 447
% 0.36/0.62 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.36/0.62 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17
% 0.36/0.62 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.36/0.62 % Termbank termtop insertions : 55292
% 0.36/0.62 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31200
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.62 % User time : 0.040 s
% 0.36/0.62 % System time : 0.034 s
% 0.36/0.62 % Total time : 0.074 s
% 0.36/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 20084 pages
% 0.36/0.62
% 0.36/0.62 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.36/0.62 % User time : 0.153 s
% 0.36/0.62 % System time : 0.049 s
% 0.36/0.62 % Total time : 0.202 s
% 0.36/0.62 % Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
% 0.36/0.62 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------