%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR028+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:58 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.94s 1.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.94s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 7 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 10 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 6 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query178,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
=> individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query178) ).
fof(ax3_20281,axiom,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_20281) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt)
=> individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query178]) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2089_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])]) ).
cnf(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_25985),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_20281]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR028+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:27:17 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.94/1.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.94/1.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.94/1.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % sh5l with pid 3513688 completed with status 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.94/1.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.94/1.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.94/1.49 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.94/1.49 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.49 % partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3513696 completed with status 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.94/1.49 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.94/1.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.94/1.49 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.94/1.49 % Search class: FHHSM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.49 % partial match(1): FHHSF-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.94/1.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.94/1.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.94/1.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.94/1.49
% 0.94/1.49 % Proof found!
% 0.94/1.49 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.94/1.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.94/1.49 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 0.94/1.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44111
% 0.94/1.49 % Initial clauses : 107
% 0.94/1.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.94/1.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 106
% 0.94/1.49 % Processed clauses : 5
% 0.94/1.49 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.94/1.49 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 3
% 0.94/1.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Generated clauses : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Paramodulations : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % NegExts : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.94/1.49 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.94/1.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.94/1.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.94/1.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 101
% 0.94/1.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 155
% 0.94/1.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.94/1.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 295276
% 0.94/1.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157783
% 0.94/1.49
% 0.94/1.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.94/1.49 % User time : 0.175 s
% 0.94/1.49 % System time : 0.089 s
% 0.94/1.49 % Total time : 0.264 s
% 0.94/1.49 % Maximum resident set size: 84532 pages
% 0.94/1.49
% 0.94/1.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.94/1.49 % User time : 0.912 s
% 0.94/1.49 % System time : 0.151 s
% 0.94/1.49 % Total time : 1.063 s
% 0.94/1.49 % Maximum resident set size: 37888 pages
% 0.94/1.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------