%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:58 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 0.48s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query79,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query79) ).
fof(ax1_337,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_337) ).
fof(ax1_1123,axiom,
! [X20,X21] :
( ( genlmt(X20,X21)
& mtvisible(X20) )
=> mtvisible(X21) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1123) ).
fof(ax1_128,axiom,
! [X5,X6] :
( geographicalsubregions(X5,X6)
=> inregion(X6,X5) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_128) ).
fof(ax1_121,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_121) ).
fof(ax1_212,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_212) ).
fof(ax1_933,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X19] :
( ( inregion(X14,X19)
& inregion(X13,X14) )
=> inregion(X13,X19) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_933) ).
fof(ax1_282,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_282) ).
fof(ax1_326,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_326) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query79]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_337])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) )
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X32,X33] :
( mtvisible(X33)
| ~ genlmt(X32,X33)
| ~ mtvisible(X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_1123])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X22,X23] :
( inregion(X23,X22)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X22,X23) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_128])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_121])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_212]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X28,X29,X30] :
( inregion(X28,X30)
| ~ inregion(X29,X30)
| ~ inregion(X28,X29) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_933])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| inregion(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_282])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_326]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ inregion(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X2)
| inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR029+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.38 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:25:33 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.48 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % new_bool_3 with pid 3728299 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.48 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 361s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3728302 completed with status 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.17/0.48 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.17/0.48 % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.17/0.48 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.17/0.48 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.17/0.48 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 % Proof found!
% 0.17/0.48 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/0.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/0.48 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.17/0.48 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1107
% 0.17/0.48 % Initial clauses : 26
% 0.17/0.48 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 0.17/0.48 % Processed clauses : 51
% 0.17/0.48 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % ...subsumed : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.17/0.48 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.17/0.48 % Generated clauses : 50
% 0.17/0.48 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 30
% 0.17/0.48 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Paramodulations : 50
% 0.17/0.48 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Total rewrite steps : 26
% 0.17/0.48 % ...of those cached : 14
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 0.17/0.48 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.17/0.48 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % Non-unit-clauses : 22
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5
% 0.17/0.48 % ...number of literals in the above : 14
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.17/0.48 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 29
% 0.17/0.48 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.17/0.48 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.17/0.48 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 14
% 0.17/0.48 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.17/0.48 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/0.48 % Termbank termtop insertions : 8953
% 0.17/0.48 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4931
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.48 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.17/0.48 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.17/0.48
% 0.17/0.48 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/0.48 % User time : 0.028 s
% 0.17/0.48 % System time : 0.021 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.17/0.48 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.17/0.48 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------