%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR029+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 10.63s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 69 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 58 ( 25 ~; 20 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query129,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query129) ).
fof(ax2_962,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_962) ).
fof(ax2_7997,axiom,
! [X21,X22] :
( ( genlmt(X21,X22)
& mtvisible(X21) )
=> mtvisible(X22) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7997) ).
fof(ax2_1935,axiom,
! [X3,X4] :
( geographicalsubregions(X3,X4)
=> inregion(X4,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1935) ).
fof(ax2_584,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_584) ).
fof(ax2_197,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_197) ).
fof(ax2_7302,axiom,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( ( inregion(X16,X17)
& inregion(X15,X16) )
=> inregion(X15,X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7302) ).
fof(ax2_849,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_849) ).
fof(ax2_1111,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1111) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query129]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_962])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) )
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X35,X36] :
( mtvisible(X36)
| ~ genlmt(X35,X36)
| ~ mtvisible(X35) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7997])])]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X23,X24] :
( inregion(X24,X23)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X23,X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1935])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_584])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_197]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X31,X32,X33] :
( inregion(X31,X33)
| ~ inregion(X32,X33)
| ~ inregion(X31,X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7302])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| inregion(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_22,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_849])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1111]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ inregion(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X2)
| inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR029+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/10.39 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.09/10.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/10.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/10.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/10.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/10.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/10.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/10.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:25:51 UTC 2026
% 0.09/10.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/10.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/10.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/10.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/10.63 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/10.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % new_bool_1 with pid 1098674 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.63 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/10.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/10.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/10.63 % Search class: FHHNS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.63 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1098677 completed with status 0
% 0.15/10.63 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/10.63 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/10.63 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/10.63 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/10.63 % Search class: FHHNS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.63 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/10.63 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/10.63 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/10.63 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/10.63
% 0.15/10.63 % Proof found!
% 0.15/10.63 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/10.63 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/10.63 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.15/10.63 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7946
% 0.15/10.63 % Initial clauses : 61
% 0.15/10.63 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/10.63 % Initial clauses in saturation : 61
% 0.15/10.63 % Processed clauses : 112
% 0.15/10.63 % ...of these trivial : 11
% 0.15/10.63 % ...subsumed : 10
% 0.15/10.64 % ...remaining for further processing : 91
% 0.15/10.64 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Backward-rewritten : 3
% 0.15/10.64 % Generated clauses : 104
% 0.15/10.64 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 66
% 0.15/10.64 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Paramodulations : 104
% 0.15/10.64 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Total rewrite steps : 53
% 0.15/10.64 % ...of those cached : 30
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.64 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.64 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.64 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.64 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/10.64 % Current number of processed clauses : 88
% 0.15/10.64 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.15/10.64 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.15/10.64 % Non-unit-clauses : 50
% 0.15/10.64 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15
% 0.15/10.64 % ...number of literals in the above : 40
% 0.15/10.64 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.15/10.64 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 281
% 0.15/10.64 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 275
% 0.15/10.64 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 9
% 0.15/10.64 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.15/10.64 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.15/10.64 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.15/10.64 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/10.64 % Termbank termtop insertions : 54118
% 0.15/10.64 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31120
% 0.15/10.64
% 0.15/10.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.64 % User time : 0.031 s
% 0.15/10.64 % System time : 0.030 s
% 0.15/10.64 % Total time : 0.060 s
% 0.15/10.64 % Maximum resident set size: 20032 pages
% 0.15/10.64
% 0.15/10.64 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/10.64 % User time : 0.145 s
% 0.15/10.64 % System time : 0.044 s
% 0.15/10.64 % Total time : 0.189 s
% 0.15/10.64 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 0.15/10.64 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------