%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR029+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.93s 1.58s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 13 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 68 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 55 ( 23 ~; 19 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query179,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query179) ).
fof(ax3_44208,axiom,
! [X22,X23] :
( ( genlmt(X22,X23)
& mtvisible(X22) )
=> mtvisible(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44208) ).
fof(ax3_7771,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_7771) ).
fof(ax3_1891,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_1891) ).
fof(ax3_18015,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
=> inregion(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_18015) ).
fof(ax3_11398,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11398) ).
fof(ax3_11699,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_11699) ).
fof(ax3_43403,axiom,
! [X16,X17,X18] :
( ( inregion(X17,X18)
& inregion(X16,X17) )
=> inregion(X16,X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43403) ).
fof(ax3_4349,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4349) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query179]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X37,X38] :
( mtvisible(X38)
| ~ genlmt(X37,X38)
| ~ mtvisible(X37) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44208])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) )
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_7771])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_1891]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X25,X26] :
( inregion(X26,X25)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X25,X26) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_18015])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_11398])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_11699]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X33,X34,X35] :
( inregion(X33,X35)
| ~ inregion(X34,X35)
| ~ inregion(X33,X34) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43403])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| inregion(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15])]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4349])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ inregion(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X2)
| inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
inregion(c_georegion_l4_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR029+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.52 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.52 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.52 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.52 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.52 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.52 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.52 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.52 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:27:02 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.52 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.52 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.93/1.58 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.93/1.58 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/1.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % new_bool_3 with pid 351785 completed with status 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.93/1.58 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/1.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.93/1.58 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.93/1.58 % Search class: FHHNS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.58 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.58 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % SubtermCWHack with pid 351788 completed with status 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.93/1.58 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.93/1.58 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.93/1.58 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.93/1.58 % Search class: FHHNS-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.58 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM33-SFFFFFNN
% 0.93/1.58 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.93/1.58 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.93/1.58 % Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.93/1.58
% 0.93/1.58 % Proof found!
% 0.93/1.58 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.93/1.58 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.93/1.58 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 0.93/1.58 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44144
% 0.93/1.58 % Initial clauses : 74
% 0.93/1.58 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 0.93/1.58 % Processed clauses : 163
% 0.93/1.58 % ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.93/1.58 % ...subsumed : 20
% 0.93/1.58 % ...remaining for further processing : 129
% 0.93/1.58 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.93/1.58 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.93/1.58 % Generated clauses : 172
% 0.93/1.58 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 113
% 0.93/1.58 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Paramodulations : 172
% 0.93/1.58 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % NegExts : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Total rewrite steps : 73
% 0.93/1.58 % ...of those cached : 45
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.58 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.58 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.58 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.58 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.93/1.58 % Current number of processed clauses : 125
% 0.93/1.58 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 52
% 0.93/1.58 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.93/1.58 % Non-unit-clauses : 72
% 0.93/1.58 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 20
% 0.93/1.58 % ...number of literals in the above : 51
% 0.93/1.58 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.93/1.58 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 588
% 0.93/1.58 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 557
% 0.93/1.58 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 0.93/1.58 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 69
% 0.93/1.58 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % BW rewrite match attempts : 4
% 0.93/1.58 % BW rewrite match successes : 4
% 0.93/1.58 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.93/1.58 % Termbank termtop insertions : 295840
% 0.93/1.58 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157778
% 0.93/1.58
% 0.93/1.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/1.58 % User time : 0.128 s
% 0.93/1.58 % System time : 0.073 s
% 0.93/1.58 % Total time : 0.201 s
% 0.93/1.58 % Maximum resident set size: 84020 pages
% 0.93/1.58
% 0.93/1.58 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.93/1.58 % User time : 0.848 s
% 0.93/1.58 % System time : 0.134 s
% 0.93/1.58 % Total time : 0.982 s
% 0.93/1.58 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 0.93/1.58 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------