↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : CSR029+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:39 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 9.25s 3.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 9.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   29 (  12 unt;   0 nHn;  29 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (   0 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   6 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_2164,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_2164) ).

cnf(i_0_445,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_445) ).

cnf(i_0_2487,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_2487) ).

cnf(i_0_1956,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_1956) ).

cnf(i_0_691,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_691) ).

cnf(i_0_404,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_404) ).

cnf(i_0_2486,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_2486) ).

cnf(i_0_69,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_69) ).

cnf(i_0_85,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_85) ).

cnf(i_0_960,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-idfesf54/lgb.p',i_0_960) ).

cnf(c_0_2498,plain,
    ( mtvisible(X1)
    | ~ mtvisible(X2)
    | ~ genlmt(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_2164 ).

cnf(c_0_2499,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    i_0_445 ).

cnf(c_0_2500,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
    i_0_2487 ).

cnf(c_0_2501,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X3,X2)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    i_0_1956 ).

cnf(c_0_2502,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X1) ),
    i_0_691 ).

cnf(c_0_2503,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    i_0_404 ).

cnf(c_0_2504,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
    i_0_2486 ).

cnf(c_0_2505,plain,
    ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
    i_0_69 ).

cnf(c_0_2506,plain,
    genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
    i_0_85 ).

cnf(c_0_2507,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2498,c_0_2499]),c_0_2500])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2508,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
    | ~ inregion(X1,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2501,c_0_2502]) ).

cnf(c_0_2509,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2503,c_0_2500])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2510,plain,
    ( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
    i_0_960 ).

cnf(c_0_2511,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
    | ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2504,c_0_2505]) ).

cnf(c_0_2512,plain,
    mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2498,c_0_2506]),c_0_2507])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2513,plain,
    ( inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
    | ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2508,c_0_2509]) ).

cnf(c_0_2514,plain,
    inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2510,c_0_2500])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2515,negated_conjecture,
    ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2511,c_0_2512])]) ).

cnf(c_0_2516,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2513,c_0_2514]),c_0_2515]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11  % Problem  : CSR029+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 16:13:44 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.85/1.03  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.85/1.03  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.85/1.03  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.85/1.03  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 9.25/3.62  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule-lgb:
% 9.25/3.62  # No SInE strategy applied
% 9.25/3.62  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 9.25/3.62  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S063N
% 9.25/3.62  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosUPred.
% 9.25/3.62  #
% 9.25/3.62  # Preprocessing time       : 0.031 s
% 9.25/3.62  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 9.25/3.62  
% 9.25/3.62  # Proof found!
% 9.25/3.62  # SZS status Theorem
% 9.25/3.62  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.25/3.62  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 9.25/3.62  
% 9.25/3.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 9.25/3.62  # User time                : 0.079 s
% 9.25/3.62  # System time              : 0.007 s
% 9.25/3.62  # Total time               : 0.085 s
% 9.25/3.62  # Maximum resident set size: 7120 pages
% 9.25/3.62  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------