%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR029+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 114.24s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 36 ( 12 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 70 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 59 ( 25 ~; 21 |; 5 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 8 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 6 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query279,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query279) ).
fof(ax5_3342125,axiom,
! [X32,X33] :
( ( genlmt(X32,X33)
& mtvisible(X32) )
=> mtvisible(X33) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3342125) ).
fof(ax5_1239739,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1239739) ).
fof(ax5_3340896,axiom,
! [X16,X18,X14] :
( ( inregion(X18,X14)
& inregion(X16,X18) )
=> inregion(X16,X14) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3340896) ).
fof(ax5_197843,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
=> inregion(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_197843) ).
fof(ax5_1341018,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1341018) ).
fof(ax5_2487571,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
=> geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2487571) ).
fof(ax5_171714,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_171714) ).
fof(ax5_826744,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_826744) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
=> ( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
& inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query279]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X102,X103] :
( mtvisible(X103)
| ~ genlmt(X102,X103)
| ~ mtvisible(X102) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_3342125])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) )
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt,c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1239739]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X37,X38,X39] :
( inregion(X37,X39)
| ~ inregion(X38,X39)
| ~ inregion(X37,X38) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_3340896])])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X35,X36] :
( inregion(X36,X35)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X35,X36) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_197843])])]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1341018])]) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
( geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_2487571])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
genlmt(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt,c_worldgeographymt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_171714]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ inregion(X2,X3)
| ~ inregion(X1,X2)
| inregion(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| inregion(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
( inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_826744])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt)
| geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mtvisible(c_worldgeographymt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ inregion(X1,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
| inregion(X1,X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member3_mt)
| inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13)
| ~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
geolevel_3(c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( ~ inregion(X1,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39)
| inregion(X1,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l4_x14_y39),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_14])]) ).
cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
~ inregion(c_geolocation_x14_y39,c_georegion_l3_x4_y13),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR029+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.36 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:26:48 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/114.24 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/114.24 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/114.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 227 seconds (1816 total)
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting new_ho_10 with 454s (2) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting sh3 with 454s (2) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 454s (2) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 454s (2) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % new_ho_10 with pid 3171618 completed with status 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.17/114.24 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/114.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 227 seconds (1816 total)
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting new_ho_10 with 454s (2) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/114.24 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/114.24 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/114.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 433 seconds (433 total)
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 39s (1) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting new_ho_10 with 44s (1) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % new_ho_10 with pid 3171777 completed with status 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.17/114.24 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/114.24 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 227 seconds (1816 total)
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting new_ho_10 with 454s (2) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/114.24 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/114.24 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/114.24 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 433 seconds (433 total)
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 39s (1) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % Starting new_ho_10 with 44s (1) cores
% 0.17/114.24 % Preprocessing time : 1.977 s
% 0.17/114.24 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.17/114.24
% 0.17/114.24 % Proof found!
% 0.17/114.24 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/114.24 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/114.24 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.17/114.24 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3328146
% 0.17/114.24 % Initial clauses : 13833
% 0.17/114.24 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/114.24 % Initial clauses in saturation : 13831
% 0.17/114.24 % Processed clauses : 29602
% 0.17/114.24 % ...of these trivial : 3055
% 0.17/114.24 % ...subsumed : 533
% 0.17/114.24 % ...remaining for further processing : 26014
% 0.17/114.24 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.17/114.24 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Backward-subsumed : 28
% 0.17/114.24 % Backward-rewritten : 489
% 0.17/114.24 % Generated clauses : 10951
% 0.17/114.24 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7056
% 0.17/114.24 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Paramodulations : 10950
% 0.17/114.24 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.17/114.24 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Total rewrite steps : 8705
% 0.17/114.24 % ...of those cached : 5602
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/114.24 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/114.24 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/114.24 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/114.24 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/114.24 % Current number of processed clauses : 13604
% 0.17/114.24 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 8927
% 0.17/114.24 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Negative unit clauses : 1189
% 0.17/114.24 % Non-unit-clauses : 3488
% 0.17/114.24 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2981
% 0.17/114.24 % ...number of literals in the above : 4390
% 0.17/114.24 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Current number of archived clauses : 12409
% 0.17/114.24 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1683242
% 0.17/114.24 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1325992
% 0.17/114.24 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 273
% 0.17/114.24 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1906635
% 0.17/114.24 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % BW rewrite match attempts : 35741
% 0.17/114.24 % BW rewrite match successes : 250
% 0.17/114.24 % Condensation attempts : 29676
% 0.17/114.24 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/114.24 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22536710
% 0.17/114.24 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10475677
% 0.17/114.24
% 0.17/114.24 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/114.24 % User time : 26.586 s
% 0.17/114.24 % System time : 8.134 s
% 0.17/114.25 % Total time : 34.720 s
% 0.17/114.25 % Maximum resident set size: 5020660 pages
% 0.17/114.25
% 0.17/114.25 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/114.25 % User time : 107.914 s
% 0.17/114.25 % System time : 15.390 s
% 0.17/114.25 % Total time : 123.305 s
% 0.17/114.25 % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.17/114.25 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------