%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR030+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:15:59 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.17s 17.55s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.17s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 33 ( 15 ~; 10 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 3 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query230,conjecture,
? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X3,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query230) ).
fof(ax4_540220,axiom,
! [X28,X29] :
( ( genlmt(X28,X29)
& mtvisible(X28) )
=> mtvisible(X29) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540220) ).
fof(ax4_56790,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_56790) ).
fof(ax4_192069,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
=> tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_192069) ).
fof(ax4_71786,axiom,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_71786) ).
fof(ax4_16164,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_16164) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X3,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query230]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X170,X171] :
( mtvisible(X171)
| ~ genlmt(X170,X171)
| ~ mtvisible(X170) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540220])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ~ tptptypes_5_387(X30,c_pushingwithopenhand)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X31,X32] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X31,X32)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X31,X32) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_56790])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_192069])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ genlmt(X1,X2)
| ~ mtvisible(X1)
| mtvisible(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
genlmt(c_tptp_member3393_mt,c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_71786]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X46,X47] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X47,X46)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X46,X47) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_16164])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt)
| tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptp_spindleheadmt),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_388(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_16_4451),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR030+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:25:52 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/17.55 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.17/17.55 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/17.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2813678 completed with status 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.17/17.55 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/17.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/17.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/17.55 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/17.55 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/17.55 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2813679 completed with status 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.17/17.55 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.17/17.55 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.17/17.55 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.17/17.55 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/17.55 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.17/17.55 % Scheduled 8 strats onto 2 cores with 572 seconds (572 total)
% 0.17/17.55 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.17/17.55 % Preprocessing time : 0.349 s
% 0.17/17.55
% 0.17/17.55 % Proof found!
% 0.17/17.55 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.17/17.55 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.17/17.55 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.17/17.55 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539324
% 0.17/17.55 % Initial clauses : 927
% 0.17/17.55 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.17/17.55 % Initial clauses in saturation : 925
% 0.17/17.55 % Processed clauses : 1311
% 0.17/17.55 % ...of these trivial : 154
% 0.17/17.55 % ...subsumed : 47
% 0.17/17.55 % ...remaining for further processing : 1110
% 0.17/17.55 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.17/17.55 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Backward-subsumed : 7
% 0.17/17.55 % Backward-rewritten : 53
% 0.17/17.55 % Generated clauses : 1253
% 0.17/17.55 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 698
% 0.17/17.55 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Paramodulations : 1251
% 0.17/17.55 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % NegExts : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.17/17.55 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Total rewrite steps : 705
% 0.17/17.55 % ...of those cached : 503
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/17.55 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/17.55 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.17/17.55 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.17/17.55 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.17/17.55 % Current number of processed clauses : 1048
% 0.17/17.55 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 664
% 0.17/17.55 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Negative unit clauses : 33
% 0.17/17.55 % Non-unit-clauses : 351
% 0.17/17.55 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 312
% 0.17/17.55 % ...number of literals in the above : 529
% 0.17/17.55 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Current number of archived clauses : 61
% 0.17/17.55 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 20153
% 0.17/17.55 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17703
% 0.17/17.55 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 47
% 0.17/17.55 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4496
% 0.17/17.55 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % BW rewrite match attempts : 24
% 0.17/17.55 % BW rewrite match successes : 22
% 0.17/17.55 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.17/17.55 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3719850
% 0.17/17.55 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2174429
% 0.17/17.55
% 0.17/17.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/17.55 % User time : 2.299 s
% 0.17/17.55 % System time : 0.998 s
% 0.17/17.55 % Total time : 3.296 s
% 0.17/17.55 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 0.17/17.55
% 0.17/17.55 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.17/17.55 % User time : 15.385 s
% 0.17/17.55 % System time : 1.961 s
% 0.17/17.55 % Total time : 17.346 s
% 0.17/17.55 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 0.17/17.55 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------