%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR030+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.16s 116.38s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 19 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 31 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 23 ( 11 ~; 6 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 3 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query280,conjecture,
? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X3,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query280) ).
fof(ax5_2286121,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2286121) ).
fof(ax5_1062480,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_8_390(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1062480) ).
fof(ax5_2577536,axiom,
! [X2,X3] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X2,X3)
=> tptptypes_6_388(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_2577536) ).
fof(ax5_1163216,axiom,
tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_14_3115),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1163216) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X3] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt)
=> tptptypes_5_387(X3,c_pushingwithopenhand) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query280]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X34] :
( ~ tptptypes_5_387(X34,c_pushingwithopenhand)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3393_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X43,X44] :
( tptptypes_5_387(X43,X44)
| ~ tptptypes_6_388(X43,X44) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_2286121])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X754,X755] :
( tptptypes_7_389(X754,X755)
| ~ tptptypes_8_390(X754,X755) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1062480])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_5_387(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_5_387(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X122,X123] :
( tptptypes_6_388(X123,X122)
| ~ tptptypes_7_389(X122,X123) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_2577536])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_8_390(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
tptptypes_8_390(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_14_3115),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax5_1163216]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_6_388(X1,c_pushingwithopenhand),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ tptptypes_7_389(X1,X2)
| tptptypes_6_388(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,c_tptpcol_14_3115),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ tptptypes_7_389(c_pushingwithopenhand,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR030+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:29:29 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/116.38 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/116.38 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/116.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 230 seconds (1840 total)
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting sh3 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2137384 completed with status 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.16/116.38 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/116.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 230 seconds (1840 total)
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting sh3 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/116.38 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/116.38 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/116.38 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 434 seconds (434 total)
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 40s (1) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 44s (1) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2137626 completed with status 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.16/116.38 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/116.38 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 230 seconds (1840 total)
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting new_ho_10 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting sh3 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 460s (2) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/116.38 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.16/116.38 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.16/116.38 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 434 seconds (434 total)
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 40s (1) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 44s (1) cores
% 0.16/116.38 % Preprocessing time : 1.567 s
% 0.16/116.38 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/116.38
% 0.16/116.38 % Proof found!
% 0.16/116.38 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/116.38 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/116.38 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.16/116.38 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3321977
% 0.16/116.38 % Initial clauses : 20002
% 0.16/116.38 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.16/116.38 % Initial clauses in saturation : 20000
% 0.16/116.38 % Processed clauses : 30603
% 0.16/116.38 % ...of these trivial : 2561
% 0.16/116.38 % ...subsumed : 435
% 0.16/116.38 % ...remaining for further processing : 27607
% 0.16/116.38 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.16/116.38 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.16/116.38 % Backward-rewritten : 497
% 0.16/116.38 % Generated clauses : 10110
% 0.16/116.38 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7569
% 0.16/116.38 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Paramodulations : 10105
% 0.16/116.38 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.16/116.38 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Total rewrite steps : 5539
% 0.16/116.38 % ...of those cached : 2491
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/116.38 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/116.38 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/116.38 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/116.38 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/116.38 % Current number of processed clauses : 9761
% 0.16/116.38 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 5814
% 0.16/116.38 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Negative unit clauses : 2018
% 0.16/116.38 % Non-unit-clauses : 1929
% 0.16/116.38 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14292
% 0.16/116.38 % ...number of literals in the above : 20156
% 0.16/116.38 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Current number of archived clauses : 17845
% 0.16/116.38 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2815680
% 0.16/116.38 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2546222
% 0.16/116.38 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 299
% 0.16/116.38 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3720799
% 0.16/116.38 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % BW rewrite match attempts : 48678
% 0.16/116.38 % BW rewrite match successes : 395
% 0.16/116.38 % Condensation attempts : 30606
% 0.16/116.38 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/116.38 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22775038
% 0.16/116.38 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10465723
% 0.16/116.38
% 0.16/116.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/116.38 % User time : 30.954 s
% 0.16/116.38 % System time : 9.195 s
% 0.16/116.38 % Total time : 40.149 s
% 0.16/116.38 % Maximum resident set size: 5024452 pages
% 0.16/116.38
% 0.16/116.38 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/116.38 % User time : 109.469 s
% 0.16/116.38 % System time : 15.738 s
% 0.16/116.38 % Total time : 125.208 s
% 0.16/116.38 % Maximum resident set size: 2273280 pages
% 0.16/116.38 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------