↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : CSR031+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:00:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 10.70s 4.35s
% Output   : Refutation 11.01s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (   8 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (   9   ~;   0   |;   4   &;  74   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  16  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   0   ^;  36   !;   0   ?;  36   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(disjointwith_decl,type,
    disjointwith: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398_decl,type,
    c_tptptptpcol_16_8398: $i ).

thf(c_tptpcol_16_18488_decl,type,
    c_tptpcol_16_18488: $i ).

thf(collection_decl,type,
    collection: $i > $o ).

thf(individual_decl,type,
    individual: $i > $o ).

thf(no_decl,type,
    no: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ collection ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_2628) ).

thf(27,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ collection ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ~ ( c_tptpcol_16_18488 @ ( c_tptptptpcol_16_8398 @ disjointwith ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query131) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ~ ( c_tptpcol_16_18488 @ ( c_tptptptpcol_16_8398 @ disjointwith ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(15,plain,
    ~ ~ ( c_tptpcol_16_18488 @ ( c_tptptptpcol_16_8398 @ disjointwith ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( A @ collection ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_7583) ).

thf(37,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( A @ collection ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ no ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_374) ).

thf(25,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ no ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ individual )
        & ( A @ collection ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_3226) ).

thf(20,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ individual )
        & ( A @ collection ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    c_tptptptpcol_16_8398 @ individual,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_2816) ).

thf(29,plain,
    c_tptptptpcol_16_8398 @ individual,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ individual )
        & ( A @ collection ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_3089) ).

thf(17,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( ( A @ individual )
        & ( A @ collection ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ collection ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_7582) ).

thf(32,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ collection ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ collection ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_2921) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ collection ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ no ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_1969) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( B @ ( A @ no ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ no ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ no ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_7901) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ no ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ no ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    c_tptptptpcol_16_8398 @ individual,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_781) ).

thf(36,plain,
    c_tptptptpcol_16_8398 @ individual,
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ disjointwith ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax2_7584) ).

thf(30,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ disjointwith ) )
     => ( A @ ( B @ disjointwith ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(46,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[27,15,37,25,20,29,17,32,34,40,23,36,30]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR031+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.13/0.40  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.40  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 00:01:32 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.41  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.41  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.32/1.24  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 4.71/2.37  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (1126ms). 
% 4.71/2.40  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 6.00/2.96  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 6.00/2.97  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 7.63/3.47  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 8005 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 8.55/3.61  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 12 axioms (removed 7993 axioms). 
% 8.55/3.65  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 8.55/3.66  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 8.55/3.67  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 10.70/4.35  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 10.70/4.35  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 10.70/4.35  % Time passed: 3742ms (effective reasoning time: 1945ms)
% 10.70/4.35  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 10.70/4.35  % Axioms used in derivation (12): ax2_3089, ax2_781, ax2_2628, ax2_2921, ax2_3226, ax2_1969, ax2_7901, ax2_7583, ax2_7584, ax2_2816, ax2_7582, ax2_374
% 10.70/4.35  % No. of inferences in proof: 28
% 10.70/4.35  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 3742 ms resp. 1945 ms w/o parsing
% 11.01/4.41  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 11.01/4.41  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------