%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR031+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:32 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.99s 14.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.99s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 20 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 11 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 1 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 2 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query181,conjecture,
~ disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query181) ).
fof(ax3_4028,axiom,
! [X1] :
~ ( collection(X1)
& individual(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4028) ).
fof(ax3_41385,axiom,
! [X6,X3] :
( disjointwith(X6,X3)
=> collection(X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_41385) ).
fof(ax3_20191,axiom,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_20191) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ~ disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query181]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ collection(X2)
| ~ individual(X2) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4028])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X7,X8] :
( ~ disjointwith(X7,X8)
| collection(X7) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_41385])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| ~ collection(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
individual(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_20191]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( collection(X1)
| ~ disjointwith(X1,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
disjointwith(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398,c_tptpcol_16_18488),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
~ collection(c_tptptptpcol_16_8398),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR031+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 18:58:35 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 12.99/14.16 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 12.99/14.16 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 12.99/14.16 # Preprocessing time : 0.658 s
% 12.99/14.16
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof found!
% 12.99/14.16 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.99/14.16 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object formula steps : 8
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 12.99/14.16 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 12.99/14.16 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.99/14.16 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 12.99/14.16 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44130
% 12.99/14.16 # Initial clauses : 87
% 12.99/14.16 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 12.99/14.16 # Initial clauses in saturation : 86
% 12.99/14.16 # Processed clauses : 98
% 12.99/14.16 # ...of these trivial : 7
% 12.99/14.16 # ...subsumed : 17
% 12.99/14.16 # ...remaining for further processing : 73
% 12.99/14.16 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 12.99/14.16 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 12.99/14.16 # Backward-subsumed : 1
% 12.99/14.16 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 12.99/14.16 # Generated clauses : 85
% 12.99/14.16 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 76
% 12.99/14.16 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 12.99/14.16 # Paramodulations : 83
% 12.99/14.16 # Factorizations : 0
% 12.99/14.16 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 12.99/14.16 # Current number of processed clauses : 65
% 12.99/14.16 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 39
% 12.99/14.16 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.99/14.16 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 12.99/14.16 # Non-unit-clauses : 25
% 12.99/14.16 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 59
% 12.99/14.16 # ...number of literals in the above : 94
% 12.99/14.16 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 12.99/14.16 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 12.99/14.16 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 124
% 12.99/14.16 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 117
% 12.99/14.16 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 17
% 12.99/14.16 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 12.99/14.16 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 12.99/14.16 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 12.99/14.16 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 12.99/14.16 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 12.99/14.16 # Condensation successes : 0
% 12.99/14.16 # Termbank termtop insertions : 295352
% 12.99/14.16
% 12.99/14.16 # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.99/14.16 # User time : 0.611 s
% 12.99/14.16 # System time : 0.049 s
% 12.99/14.16 # Total time : 0.660 s
% 12.99/14.16 # Maximum resident set size: 87232 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------