%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Duper---1.0 % Problem : CSR032+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : duper %s % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Fri Oct 3 07:46:05 PM UTC 2025 % Result : Theorem 3.95s 4.10s % Output : Proof 3.95s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.09/0.14 % Problem : CSR032+1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v3.4.0. % 0.09/0.15 % Command : duper %s % 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu % 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Oct 2 20:09:08 EDT 2025 % 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime : % 3.95/4.10 SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p % 3.95/4.10 SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p % 3.95/4.10 Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (individual (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france)) True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #9 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (OBJ : Iota), individual OBJ → trajector_underspecified OBJ) True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #39 (by assumption #[]): Eq (∀ (X : Iota), trajector_underspecified X → isa X c_trajector_underspecified) True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #55 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun COL => mtvisible c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt → isa (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france) COL)) % 3.95/4.10 True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #60 (by clausification #[9]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (individual a → trajector_underspecified a) True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #61 (by clausification #[60]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (individual a) False) (Eq (trajector_underspecified a) True) % 3.95/4.10 Clause #62 (by superposition #[61, 0]): Or (Eq (trajector_underspecified (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france)) True) (Eq False True) % 3.95/4.10 Clause #95 (by clausification #[39]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (trajector_underspecified a → isa a c_trajector_underspecified) True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #96 (by clausification #[95]): ∀ (a : Iota), Or (Eq (trajector_underspecified a) False) (Eq (isa a c_trajector_underspecified) True) % 3.95/4.10 Clause #238 (by clausification #[62]): Eq (trajector_underspecified (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france)) True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #240 (by superposition #[238, 96]): Or (Eq True False) (Eq (isa (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france) c_trajector_underspecified) True) % 3.95/4.10 Clause #259 (by clausification #[240]): Eq (isa (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france) c_trajector_underspecified) True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #294 (by clausification #[55]): Eq (Exists fun COL => mtvisible c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt → isa (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france) COL) False % 3.95/4.10 Clause #295 (by clausification #[294]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (mtvisible c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt → isa (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france) a) False % 3.95/4.10 Clause #297 (by clausification #[295]): ∀ (a : Iota), Eq (isa (f_citynamedfn s_agen c_france) a) False % 3.95/4.10 Clause #299 (by superposition #[297, 259]): Eq False True % 3.95/4.10 Clause #300 (by clausification #[299]): False % 3.95/4.10 SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p %------------------------------------------------------------------------------