%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:10:00 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 2.31s 0.96s
% Output : CNFRefutation 2.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 35 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 27 ( 13 ~; 9 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 14 !; 2 ?; 6 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f318,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_318) ).
fof(f390,axiom,
! [X0] :
( individual(X0)
=> trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_390) ).
fof(f1012,axiom,
! [X0] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
=> isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1012) ).
fof(f1132,conjecture,
? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query82) ).
fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1132]) ).
fof(f1409,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ individual(X0)
| trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f390]) ).
fof(f1898,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ trajector_underspecified(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1012]) ).
fof(f2022,plain,
! [X0] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
& ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1133]) ).
fof(f2338,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f318]) ).
fof(f2410,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ individual(X0)
| trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1409]) ).
fof(f2952,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ trajector_underspecified(X0)
| isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1898]) ).
fof(f3063,plain,
! [X0] : ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2022]) ).
tcf(c_364,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2338]) ).
tcf(c_436,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2410]) ).
tcf(c_978,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2952]) ).
tcf(c_1088,negated_conjecture,
! [X0: $i] : ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3063]) ).
tcf(c_2412,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ trajector_underspecified(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_978]) ).
tcf(c_2616,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( trajector_underspecified(X0)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_436]) ).
tcf(c_11645,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( isa(X0,c_trajector_underspecified)
| ~ individual(X0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2616,c_2412]) ).
tcf(c_17649,plain,
isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),c_trajector_underspecified),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11645,c_364]) ).
tcf(c_17652,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_17649,c_1088]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : CSR032+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.30 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.30 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.30 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.03/0.30 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 08:16:20 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.30 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.32 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.32 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.32
% 0.03/0.32 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.03/0.32
% 0.03/0.32 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.07/0.33 % Proving...
% 2.31/0.96 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.31/0.96 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96 % ------ iProver source info
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.31/0.96 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.31/0.96 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96 % ------ Parsing...
% 2.31/0.96 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 30 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe:8:0s pe:16:0s pe:32:0s pe:64:0s pe:128:0s%
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.31/0.96
% 2.31/0.96
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------