%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR032+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:01 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.30s 0.76s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 18 ( 8 ~; 5 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax2_7841,axiom,
! [X15] :
( thing(X15)
=> isa(X15,c_thing) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7841) ).
fof(ax2_829,axiom,
! [X1] :
( individual(X1)
=> thing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_829) ).
fof(query132,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query132) ).
fof(ax2_496,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_496) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X200] :
( isa(X200,c_thing)
| ~ thing(X200) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7841])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X51] :
( thing(X51)
| ~ individual(X51) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_829])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X23) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query132]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ thing(X1)
| isa(X1,c_thing) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| thing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X24)
& mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| isa(X1,c_thing) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_496]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR032+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.38 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:24:21 UTC 2026
% 0.13/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/0.43 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.30/0.76 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.30/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % sh5l with pid 1327265 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.30/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.30/0.76 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.30/0.76 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.76 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.76 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1327269 completed with status 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.30/0.76 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.30/0.76 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.30/0.76 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.30/0.76 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.76 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.30/0.76 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.30/0.76 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.30/0.76 % Preprocessing time : 0.022 s
% 0.30/0.76
% 0.30/0.76 % Proof found!
% 0.30/0.76 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.30/0.76 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.30/0.76 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.30/0.76 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7115
% 0.30/0.76 % Initial clauses : 892
% 0.30/0.76 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Initial clauses in saturation : 892
% 0.30/0.76 % Processed clauses : 1410
% 0.30/0.76 % ...of these trivial : 288
% 0.30/0.76 % ...subsumed : 39
% 0.30/0.76 % ...remaining for further processing : 1083
% 0.30/0.76 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.30/0.76 % Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.30/0.76 % Generated clauses : 1510
% 0.30/0.76 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 874
% 0.30/0.76 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Paramodulations : 1510
% 0.30/0.76 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % NegExts : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Total rewrite steps : 861
% 0.30/0.76 % ...of those cached : 570
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.76 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.76 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.76 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.76 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.30/0.76 % Current number of processed clauses : 1080
% 0.30/0.76 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 807
% 0.30/0.76 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Negative unit clauses : 12
% 0.30/0.76 % Non-unit-clauses : 261
% 0.30/0.76 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 356
% 0.30/0.76 % ...number of literals in the above : 662
% 0.30/0.76 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Current number of archived clauses : 3
% 0.30/0.76 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7768
% 0.30/0.76 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7033
% 0.30/0.76 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 40
% 0.30/0.76 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1622
% 0.30/0.76 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.30/0.76 % BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.30/0.76 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.30/0.76 % Termbank termtop insertions : 94799
% 0.30/0.76 % Search garbage collected termcells : 32268
% 0.30/0.76
% 0.30/0.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.76 % User time : 0.094 s
% 0.30/0.76 % System time : 0.056 s
% 0.30/0.76 % Total time : 0.149 s
% 0.30/0.76 % Maximum resident set size: 20596 pages
% 0.30/0.76
% 0.30/0.76 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.76 % User time : 0.209 s
% 0.30/0.76 % System time : 0.072 s
% 0.30/0.76 % Total time : 0.281 s
% 0.30/0.76 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 0.30/0.76 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------