%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR032+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:33 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.76s 1.94s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.76s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 1 sgn 3 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query132,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query132) ).
fof(ax2_7971,axiom,
! [X15] :
( individual(X15)
=> isa(X15,c_individual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7971) ).
fof(ax2_496,axiom,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_496) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
=> isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X23) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query132]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( mtvisible(c_reasoningaboutpossibleantecedentsmt)
& ~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X24) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X16] :
( ~ individual(X16)
| isa(X16,c_individual) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7971])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
individual(f_citynamedfn(s_agen,c_france)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_496]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : CSR032+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 14:31:44 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.76/1.94 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.76/1.94 # Preprocessing time : 0.265 s
% 0.76/1.94
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof found!
% 0.76/1.94 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.76/1.94 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.76/1.94 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 2
% 0.76/1.94 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.76/1.94 # Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.76/1.94 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Initial clauses : 8007
% 0.76/1.94 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8007
% 0.76/1.94 # Processed clauses : 720
% 0.76/1.94 # ...of these trivial : 38
% 0.76/1.94 # ...subsumed : 68
% 0.76/1.94 # ...remaining for further processing : 614
% 0.76/1.94 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.76/1.94 # Generated clauses : 64
% 0.76/1.94 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 63
% 0.76/1.94 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Paramodulations : 64
% 0.76/1.94 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Current number of processed clauses : 613
% 0.76/1.94 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 434
% 0.76/1.94 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Negative unit clauses : 34
% 0.76/1.94 # Non-unit-clauses : 145
% 0.76/1.94 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7350
% 0.76/1.94 # ...number of literals in the above : 12164
% 0.76/1.94 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Current number of archived clauses : 1
% 0.76/1.94 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3002
% 0.76/1.94 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2992
% 0.76/1.94 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.76/1.94 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1860
% 0.76/1.94 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.76/1.94 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.76/1.94 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.76/1.94 # Termbank termtop insertions : 288507
% 0.76/1.94
% 0.76/1.94 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.76/1.94 # User time : 0.260 s
% 0.76/1.94 # System time : 0.023 s
% 0.76/1.94 # Total time : 0.283 s
% 0.76/1.94 # Maximum resident set size: 29832 pages
% 0.76/23.94 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.76/23.95 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.95 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.95 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.95 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.96 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.96 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.96 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.96 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.97 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.97 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.97 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.97 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.98 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.98 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.99 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.99 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/23.99 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/23.99 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/24.00 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/24.00 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.76/24.00 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.76/24.00 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------