%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR034+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:02 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 23 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query134,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query134) ).
fof(ax2_2915,axiom,
! [X1] :
( geographicalthing(X1)
=> enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2915) ).
fof(ax2_7755,axiom,
! [X15] :
( enduringthing_localized(X15)
=> isa(X15,c_enduringthing_localized) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7755) ).
fof(ax2_2732,axiom,
geographicalthing(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_2732) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X23) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query134]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X27] :
( enduringthing_localized(X27)
| ~ geographicalthing(X27) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_2915])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X24)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X38] :
( isa(X38,c_enduringthing_localized)
| ~ enduringthing_localized(X38) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7755])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ geographicalthing(X1)
| enduringthing_localized(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
geographicalthing(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_2732]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ enduringthing_localized(X1)
| isa(X1,c_enduringthing_localized) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
enduringthing_localized(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR034+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:31:06 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.27/0.61 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.27/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % new_bool_3 with pid 1701687 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.27/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.61 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1701691 completed with status 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.27/0.61 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.27/0.61 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.27/0.61 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.27/0.61 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.27/0.61 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.27/0.61 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.27/0.61 % Preprocessing time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/0.61
% 0.27/0.61 % Proof found!
% 0.27/0.61 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/0.61 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/0.61 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.27/0.61 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7970
% 0.27/0.61 % Initial clauses : 37
% 0.27/0.61 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Initial clauses in saturation : 37
% 0.27/0.61 % Processed clauses : 30
% 0.27/0.61 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 0.27/0.61 % ...subsumed : 5
% 0.27/0.61 % ...remaining for further processing : 23
% 0.27/0.61 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.27/0.61 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.27/0.61 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.27/0.61 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % NegExts : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.27/0.61 % ...of those cached : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.61 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.61 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.61 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.61 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.27/0.61 % Current number of processed clauses : 23
% 0.27/0.61 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 0.27/0.61 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/0.61 % Non-unit-clauses : 10
% 0.27/0.61 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10
% 0.27/0.61 % ...number of literals in the above : 22
% 0.27/0.61 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14
% 0.27/0.61 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.27/0.61 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 0.27/0.61 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/0.61 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52241
% 0.27/0.61 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31113
% 0.27/0.61
% 0.27/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.61 % User time : 0.029 s
% 0.27/0.61 % System time : 0.029 s
% 0.27/0.61 % Total time : 0.058 s
% 0.27/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 20084 pages
% 0.27/0.61
% 0.27/0.61 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/0.61 % User time : 0.149 s
% 0.27/0.61 % System time : 0.039 s
% 0.27/0.61 % Total time : 0.188 s
% 0.27/0.61 % Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
% 0.27/0.61 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------