%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR034+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.24s 1.53s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 1 sgn 3 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query184,conjecture,
? [X24] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query184) ).
fof(ax3_44154,axiom,
! [X16] :
( individual(X16)
=> isa(X16,c_individual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44154) ).
fof(ax3_870,axiom,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_870) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X24] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X24) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query184]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X29] :
( isa(X29,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X29) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44154])])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X25] :
( ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X25)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( ~ individual(X1)
| isa(X1,c_individual) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_870]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR034+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:30:51 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.24/1.53 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.24/1.53 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.24/1.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % new_bool_1 with pid 1701277 completed with status 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.24/1.53 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.24/1.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.24/1.53 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.24/1.53 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.24/1.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1701279 completed with status 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.24/1.53 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.24/1.53 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.24/1.53 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.24/1.53 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 1.24/1.53 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.24/1.53 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.24/1.53 % Preprocessing time : 0.033 s
% 1.24/1.53
% 1.24/1.53 % Proof found!
% 1.24/1.53 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.24/1.53 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.24/1.53 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.24/1.53 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44182
% 1.24/1.53 % Initial clauses : 36
% 1.24/1.53 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Initial clauses in saturation : 36
% 1.24/1.53 % Processed clauses : 32
% 1.24/1.53 % ...of these trivial : 2
% 1.24/1.53 % ...subsumed : 5
% 1.24/1.53 % ...remaining for further processing : 25
% 1.24/1.53 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Generated clauses : 4
% 1.24/1.53 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 1.24/1.53 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Paramodulations : 4
% 1.24/1.53 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % NegExts : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 1.24/1.53 % ...of those cached : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.24/1.53 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.24/1.53 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.24/1.53 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.24/1.53 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.24/1.53 % Current number of processed clauses : 25
% 1.24/1.53 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 12
% 1.24/1.53 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 1.24/1.53 % Non-unit-clauses : 12
% 1.24/1.53 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 7
% 1.24/1.53 % ...number of literals in the above : 16
% 1.24/1.53 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21
% 1.24/1.53 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 21
% 1.24/1.53 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 1.24/1.53 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.24/1.53 % Termbank termtop insertions : 293009
% 1.24/1.53 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157749
% 1.24/1.53
% 1.24/1.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.24/1.53 % User time : 0.187 s
% 1.24/1.53 % System time : 0.117 s
% 1.24/1.53 % Total time : 0.304 s
% 1.24/1.53 % Maximum resident set size: 83764 pages
% 1.24/1.53
% 1.24/1.53 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.24/1.53 % User time : 0.926 s
% 1.24/1.53 % System time : 0.169 s
% 1.24/1.53 % Total time : 1.095 s
% 1.24/1.53 % Maximum resident set size: 37888 pages
% 1.24/1.53 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------