%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR034+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.28s 13.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 10 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 16 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 1 sgn 3 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query184,conjecture,
? [X24] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query184) ).
fof(ax3_44154,axiom,
! [X16] :
( individual(X16)
=> isa(X16,c_individual) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44154) ).
fof(ax3_870,axiom,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_870) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X24] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X24) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query184]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X17] :
( ~ individual(X17)
| isa(X17,c_individual) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44154])]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X25] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
& ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X25) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax3_870]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]),c_0_8]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : CSR034+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 04:56:11 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 12.28/13.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 12.28/13.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 12.28/13.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.626 s
% 12.28/13.44
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof found!
% 12.28/13.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.28/13.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object total steps : 10
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object clause steps : 4
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object formula steps : 6
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 3
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 12.28/13.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 12.28/13.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.28/13.44 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 12.28/13.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44164
% 12.28/13.44 # Initial clauses : 54
% 12.28/13.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 54
% 12.28/13.44 # Processed clauses : 30
% 12.28/13.44 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 12.28/13.44 # ...subsumed : 2
% 12.28/13.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 24
% 12.28/13.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Generated clauses : 15
% 12.28/13.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 9
% 12.28/13.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Paramodulations : 15
% 12.28/13.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 12.28/13.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 14
% 12.28/13.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 12.28/13.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 9
% 12.28/13.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 33
% 12.28/13.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 65
% 12.28/13.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 12.28/13.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 12.28/13.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 12.28/13.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 12.28/13.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 12.28/13.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 293409
% 12.28/13.44
% 12.28/13.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.28/13.44 # User time : 0.591 s
% 12.28/13.44 # System time : 0.036 s
% 12.28/13.44 # Total time : 0.627 s
% 12.28/13.44 # Maximum resident set size: 86404 pages
% 12.28/13.64 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.64 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.65 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.65 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.66 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.66 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.66 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.66 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.67 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.67 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.68 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.68 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.69 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.69 eprover: No such file or directory
% 12.28/13.70 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 12.28/13.70 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------