%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SInE---0.4
% Problem : CSR034+4 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : Source/sine.py -e eprover -t %d %s
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Dec 25 06:08:43 EST 2010
% Result : Theorem 7.01s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.01s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 14 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 15 ( 7 ~; 3 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 9 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(14,axiom,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
file('/tmp/tmpeyODW6/sel_CSR034+4.p_1',ax3_870) ).
fof(26,axiom,
! [X1] :
( individual(X1)
=> isa(X1,c_individual) ),
file('/tmp/tmpeyODW6/sel_CSR034+4.p_1',ax3_44154) ).
fof(61,conjecture,
? [X12] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X12) ),
file('/tmp/tmpeyODW6/sel_CSR034+4.p_1',query184) ).
fof(62,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X12] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X12) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[61]) ).
cnf(93,plain,
individual(c_wanica_districtsuriname),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[14]) ).
fof(119,plain,
! [X1] :
( ~ individual(X1)
| isa(X1,c_individual) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[26]) ).
fof(120,plain,
! [X2] :
( ~ individual(X2)
| isa(X2,c_individual) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[119]) ).
cnf(121,plain,
( isa(X1,c_individual)
| ~ individual(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[120]) ).
fof(205,negated_conjecture,
! [X12] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
& ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X12) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[62]) ).
fof(206,negated_conjecture,
! [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
& ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X13) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[205]) ).
cnf(207,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[206]) ).
cnf(220,plain,
isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,c_individual),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[121,93,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(221,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[220,207,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(222,plain,
$false,
221,
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% % SZS status Started for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR034+4.p
% --creating new selector for [CSR002+3.ax]
% -running prover on /tmp/tmpeyODW6/sel_CSR034+4.p_1 with time limit 29
% -prover status Theorem
% Problem CSR034+4.p solved in phase 0.
% % SZS status Theorem for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR034+4.p
% % SZS status Ended for /home/graph/tptp/TPTP/Problems/CSR/CSR034+4.p
% Solved 1 out of 1.
% # Problem is unsatisfiable (or provable), constructing proof object
% # SZS status Theorem
% # SZS output start CNFRefutation.
% See solution above
% # SZS output end CNFRefutation
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------