%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR034+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 22.11s 22.28s
% Output : CNFRefutation 22.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 15 ( 4 sgn 7 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax4_449505,axiom,
! [X2,X7] :
( X2 = X7
=> thing(X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_449505) ).
fof(query234,conjecture,
? [X30] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X30) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query234) ).
fof(ax4_540099,axiom,
! [X23] :
( thing(X23)
=> isa(X23,c_thing) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540099) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
! [X201,X202] :
( thing(X202)
| X201 != X202 ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_449505])])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X30] :
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt)
=> isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X30) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query234]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X218] :
( isa(X218,c_thing)
| ~ thing(X218) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_540099])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( X1 != X2
| thing(X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X31] :
( ~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X31)
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member3515_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ thing(X1)
| isa(X1,c_thing) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
thing(X1),
inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(c_wanica_districtsuriname,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
isa(X1,c_thing),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR034+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.46 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.46 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.46 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.46 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.46 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.46 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.18/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:27:27 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.22/0.55 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.22/0.55 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 22.11/22.28 % Version: 3.5.1
% 22.11/22.28 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 22.11/22.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting sh3 with 568s (2) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 568s (2) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 568s (2) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % new_ho_10 with pid 3074561 completed with status 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 22.11/22.28 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 22.11/22.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 22.11/22.28 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 22.11/22.28 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 22.11/22.28 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 22.11/22.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 564 seconds (564 total)
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 57s (1) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % new_ho_10 with pid 3074566 completed with status 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 22.11/22.28 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 22.11/22.28 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 284 seconds (2272 total)
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 568s (2) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 22.11/22.28 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 22.11/22.28 % Search class: FHHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 22.11/22.28 % partial match(1): FGHSM-FSLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 22.11/22.28 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 564 seconds (564 total)
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 51s (1) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % Starting new_ho_10 with 57s (1) cores
% 22.11/22.28 % Preprocessing time : 0.247 s
% 22.11/22.28 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 22.11/22.28
% 22.11/22.28 % Proof found!
% 22.11/22.28 % SZS status Theorem
% 22.11/22.28 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 22.11/22.28 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 22.11/22.28 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539904
% 22.11/22.28 % Initial clauses : 347
% 22.11/22.28 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 22.11/22.28 % Initial clauses in saturation : 345
% 22.11/22.28 % Processed clauses : 363
% 22.11/22.28 % ...of these trivial : 30
% 22.11/22.28 % ...subsumed : 19
% 22.11/22.28 % ...remaining for further processing : 314
% 22.11/22.28 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 22.11/22.28 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 22.11/22.28 % Backward-rewritten : 10
% 22.11/22.28 % Generated clauses : 3
% 22.11/22.28 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 22.11/22.28 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Paramodulations : 2
% 22.11/22.28 % Factorizations : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % NegExts : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 22.11/22.28 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Total rewrite steps : 42
% 22.11/22.28 % ...of those cached : 17
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional check models : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 22.11/22.28 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 22.11/22.28 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 22.11/22.28 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 22.11/22.28 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 22.11/22.28 % Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 22.11/22.28 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 22.11/22.28 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Negative unit clauses : 4
% 22.11/22.28 % Non-unit-clauses : 3
% 22.11/22.28 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 269
% 22.11/22.28 % ...number of literals in the above : 371
% 22.11/22.28 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Current number of archived clauses : 296
% 22.11/22.28 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1132
% 22.11/22.28 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 981
% 22.11/22.28 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 20
% 22.11/22.28 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 30
% 22.11/22.28 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 22.11/22.28 % BW rewrite match successes : 7
% 22.11/22.28 % Condensation attempts : 363
% 22.11/22.28 % Condensation successes : 0
% 22.11/22.28 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3689484
% 22.11/22.28 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173462
% 22.11/22.28
% 22.11/22.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 22.11/22.28 % User time : 3.341 s
% 22.11/22.28 % System time : 1.459 s
% 22.11/22.28 % Total time : 4.800 s
% 22.11/22.28 % Maximum resident set size: 1242148 pages
% 22.11/22.28
% 22.11/22.28 % -------------------------------------------------
% 22.11/22.28 % User time : 19.479 s
% 22.11/22.28 % System time : 2.384 s
% 22.11/22.28 % Total time : 21.863 s
% 22.11/22.28 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 22.11/22.28 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------