↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR035+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.81s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   4 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   16 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   5   ~;   2   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   1 sgn   1   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query135,conjecture,
    ? [X15] :
      ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
     => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X15) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query135) ).

fof(ax2_572,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
   => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_572) ).

fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X15] :
        ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
       => prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X15) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query135]) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt)
    | prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_572]) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X16] :
      ( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
      & ~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X16) ),
    inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    ( prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_englishmt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR035+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 17:54:07 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.81/1.99  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.81/1.99  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.81/1.99  # Preprocessing time       : 0.150 s
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.81/1.99  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.81/1.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7933
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses                      : 74
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 74
% 0.81/1.99  # Processed clauses                    : 74
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # ...subsumed                          : 13
% 0.81/1.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 61
% 0.81/1.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Generated clauses                    : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Paramodulations                      : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 61
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 40
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.81/1.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 20
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 134
% 0.81/1.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 101
% 0.81/1.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 13
% 0.81/1.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.81/1.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 54233
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/1.99  # User time                : 0.128 s
% 0.81/1.99  # System time              : 0.023 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Total time               : 0.152 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Maximum resident set size: 19720 pages
% 0.81/1.99  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.81/1.99  # Preprocessing time       : 0.213 s
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof found!
% 0.81/1.99  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.99  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object total steps             : 10
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object clause steps            : 5
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object formula steps           : 5
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object conjectures             : 5
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object generating inferences   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.81/1.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses                      : 8007
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 8007
% 0.81/1.99  # Processed clauses                    : 2149
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 88
% 0.81/1.99  # ...subsumed                          : 166
% 0.81/1.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 1895
% 0.81/1.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.81/1.99  # Generated clauses                    : 653
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 544
% 0.81/1.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Paramodulations                      : 650
% 0.81/1.99  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 1876
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 963
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 33
% 0.81/1.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 880
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6399
% 0.81/1.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 10877
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 19
% 0.81/1.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 142156
% 0.81/1.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 140854
% 0.81/1.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 166
% 0.81/1.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4268
% 0.81/1.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 16
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 16
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 296957
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/1.99  # User time                : 0.244 s
% 0.81/1.99  # System time              : 0.024 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Total time               : 0.268 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Maximum resident set size: 33564 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------