%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR035+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.96s 1.87s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.96s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 2
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 11 ( 5 ~; 2 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 3 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 1 sgn 1 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query185,conjecture,
? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query185) ).
fof(ax3_4888,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_4888) ).
fof(c_0_2,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X16] :
( mtvisible(c_englishmt)
=> prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X16) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query185]) ).
fof(c_0_3,plain,
( prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege)
| ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_4888])]) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
! [X24] :
( ~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X24)
& mtvisible(c_englishmt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_englishmt)
| prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),s_thefootballteamwhohasbeenaffiliatedwithbeloitcollege) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_englishmt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ prettystring(f_instancewithrelationtofn(c_footballteam,c_affiliatedwith,c_beloitcollege),X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6])]),c_0_7]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR035+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:31:22 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.96/1.87 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.96/1.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.96/1.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % sh5l with pid 1702100 completed with status 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.96/1.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.96/1.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.96/1.87 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.96/1.87 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.96/1.87 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.96/1.87 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1702105 completed with status 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.96/1.87 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.96/1.87 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.96/1.87 % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.96/1.87 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.96/1.87 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.96/1.87 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.96/1.87 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.96/1.87 % Preprocessing time : 0.043 s
% 0.96/1.87
% 0.96/1.87 % Proof found!
% 0.96/1.87 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.96/1.87 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.96/1.87 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 0.96/1.87 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 43077
% 0.96/1.87 % Initial clauses : 1141
% 0.96/1.87 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.96/1.87 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1140
% 0.96/1.87 % Processed clauses : 2398
% 0.96/1.87 % ...of these trivial : 303
% 0.96/1.87 % ...subsumed : 469
% 0.96/1.87 % ...remaining for further processing : 1625
% 0.96/1.87 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.96/1.87 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.96/1.87 % Backward-rewritten : 20
% 0.96/1.87 % Generated clauses : 3220
% 0.96/1.87 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2255
% 0.96/1.87 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Paramodulations : 3219
% 0.96/1.87 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % NegExts : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.96/1.87 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Total rewrite steps : 1021
% 0.96/1.87 % ...of those cached : 773
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.96/1.87 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.96/1.87 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.96/1.87 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.96/1.87 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.96/1.87 % Current number of processed clauses : 1596
% 0.96/1.87 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 836
% 0.96/1.87 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Negative unit clauses : 381
% 0.96/1.87 % Non-unit-clauses : 379
% 0.96/1.87 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 988
% 0.96/1.87 % ...number of literals in the above : 1690
% 0.96/1.87 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Current number of archived clauses : 28
% 0.96/1.87 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 18704
% 0.96/1.87 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17364
% 0.96/1.87 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 84
% 0.96/1.87 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 59318
% 0.96/1.87 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % BW rewrite match attempts : 43
% 0.96/1.87 % BW rewrite match successes : 10
% 0.96/1.87 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.96/1.87 % Termbank termtop insertions : 358397
% 0.96/1.87 % Search garbage collected termcells : 158014
% 0.96/1.87
% 0.96/1.87 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.96/1.87 % User time : 0.397 s
% 0.96/1.87 % System time : 0.206 s
% 0.96/1.87 % Total time : 0.604 s
% 0.96/1.87 % Maximum resident set size: 84276 pages
% 0.96/1.87
% 0.96/1.87 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.96/1.87 % User time : 1.139 s
% 0.96/1.87 % System time : 0.277 s
% 0.96/1.87 % Total time : 1.415 s
% 0.96/1.87 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 0.96/1.87 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------