%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.23s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query37,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query37) ).
fof(just13,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just13) ).
fof(just34,axiom,
! [X10,X11,X12] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X11,X12)
& geographicalsubregions(X10,X11) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X10,X12) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just34) ).
fof(just12,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just12) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query37]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just13])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X17,X18,X19] :
( geographicalsubregions(X17,X19)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X18,X19)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X17,X18) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just34])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just12])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.38 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:29:12 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.23/0.49 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.23/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % new_bool_3 with pid 2006196 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.49 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2006199 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.23/0.49 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.23/0.49 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.49 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.49 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 % Proof found!
% 0.23/0.49 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/0.49 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.49 % Parsed axioms : 66
% 0.23/0.49 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 60
% 0.23/0.49 % Initial clauses : 7
% 0.23/0.49 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7
% 0.23/0.49 % Processed clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.49 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.23/0.49 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Generated clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.49 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.23/0.49 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Paramodulations : 4
% 0.23/0.49 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Total rewrite steps : 3
% 0.23/0.49 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 % Current number of processed clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.49 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.23/0.49 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.23/0.49 % Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.49 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.23/0.49 % ...number of literals in the above : 2
% 0.23/0.49 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.23/0.49 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.23/0.49 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.49 % Termbank termtop insertions : 898
% 0.23/0.49 % Search garbage collected termcells : 366
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.49 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.49 % System time : 0.000 s
% 0.23/0.49 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.23/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 3692 pages
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.49 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.49 % System time : 0.006 s
% 0.23/0.49 % Total time : 0.013 s
% 0.23/0.49 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.23/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------