%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:21:21 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 1.31s 1.50s
% Output : Refutation 1.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:49:08 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.35 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.35 The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.35 Sat Jun 11 05:49:08 2022
% 0.12/0.35 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9216.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.35 set(auto).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.35 clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 This is a Horn set without equality. The strategy will
% 0.12/0.35 be hyperresolution, with satellites in sos and nuclei
% 0.12/0.35 in usable.
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.35 dependent: clear(order_hyper).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlpreds(A,B)|predicate(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 10 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -predicate(A)|genlpreds(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 24 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 25 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -isa(A,B)|thing(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 33 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)|collection(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 36 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -collection(A)|genls(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(C,A)|genls(C,B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genls(A,B)| -genls(B,C)|genls(A,C).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(B).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 39 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -genlmt(A,B)|microtheory(A).
% 0.12/0.35 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -microtheory(A)|genlmt(A,A).
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.35
% 0.12/0.35 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.12/0.39 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.12/0.39 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses in intial UL: 42
% 0.12/0.39 number of clauses initially in problem: 54
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 77
% 0.12/0.39 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 77
% 0.12/0.39 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.12/0.39 absolute distinct symbol count: 31
% 0.12/0.39 distinct predicate count: 17
% 0.12/0.39 distinct function count: 0
% 0.12/0.39 distinct constant count: 14
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.12/0.39
% 0.12/0.39 =========== start of search ===========
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 -------- PROOF --------
% 1.31/1.50 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.31/1.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 4 [ 1 1 198 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 5 [ 2 0 159 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 6 [ 2 1 289 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 7 [ 1 0 247 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 8 [ 2 1 285 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 9 [ 1 0 391 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 10 [ 1 0 495 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 ----> UNIT CONFLICT at 1.14 sec ----> 84 [binary,83.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Length of proof is 3. Level of proof is 2.
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.31/1.50 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.31/1.50 % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 3 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24).
% 1.31/1.50 4 [] {+} -mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)|geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72).
% 1.31/1.50 22 [] {+} -geographicalsubregions(A,B)| -geographicalsubregions(B,C)|geographicalsubregions(A,C).
% 1.31/1.50 42 [] {+} -geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72).
% 1.31/1.50 54 [] {-} mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt).
% 1.31/1.50 59 [hyper,54,4] {+} geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72).
% 1.31/1.50 60 [hyper,54,3] {-} geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24).
% 1.31/1.50 83 [hyper,60,22,59] {-} geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72).
% 1.31/1.50 84 [binary,83.1,42.1] {-} $F.
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.31/1.50 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 ============ end of search ============
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 true clauses given 5 (26.3%)
% 1.31/1.50 false clauses given 14
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 FALSE TRUE
% 1.31/1.50 2 0 11
% 1.31/1.50 3 2 8
% 1.31/1.50 tot: 2 19 (90.5% true)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Model 10 [ 1 -6 495 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.31/1.50
% 1.31/1.50 Process 9216 finished Sat Jun 11 05:49:09 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------