%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:28 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 0.19s 0.44s % Output : Refutation 0.19s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu % 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 05:35:24 EDT 2022 % 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.19/0.44 % 0.19/0.44 SPASS V 3.9 % 0.19/0.44 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 0.19/0.44 % SZS status Theorem % 0.19/0.44 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 0.19/0.44 SPASS derived 23 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 68 clauses. % 0.19/0.44 SPASS allocated 97727 KBytes. % 0.19/0.44 SPASS spent 0:00:00.09 on the problem. % 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the input. % 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for inferences. % 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 0.19/0.44 0:00:00.00 for the reduction. % 0.19/0.44 % 0.19/0.44 % 0.19/0.44 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 : % 0.19/0.44 % SZS output start Refutation % 0.19/0.44 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)*. % 0.19/0.44 13[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*l+ -> . % 0.19/0.44 16[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24). % 0.19/0.44 17[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72). % 0.19/0.44 61[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(u,v)* geographicalsubregions(v,w)* -> geographicalsubregions(u,w)*. % 0.19/0.44 68[0:MRR:17.0,1.0] || -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*l. % 0.19/0.44 69[0:MRR:16.0,1.0] || -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)*l. % 0.19/0.44 121[0:NCh:61.2,61.0,13.0,69.0] || geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*l -> . % 0.19/0.44 122[0:MRR:121.0,68.0] || -> . % 0.19/0.44 % SZS output end Refutation % 0.19/0.44 Formulae used in the proof : query37 just12 just13 just34 % 0.19/0.44 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------