%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:10:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 11.91s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 19 ~; 15 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f12,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just12) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just13) ).
fof(f34,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
& geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just34) ).
fof(f66,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query37) ).
fof(f67,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f66]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f12]) ).
fof(f75,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).
fof(f100,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f34]) ).
fof(f101,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f100]) ).
fof(f135,plain,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).
fof(f147,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).
fof(f148,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f75]) ).
fof(f167,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f101]) ).
fof(f197,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).
fof(f198,plain,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f135]) ).
tcf(c_60,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f147]) ).
tcf(c_61,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f148]) ).
tcf(c_80,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f167]) ).
tcf(c_110,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f198]) ).
tcf(c_111,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f197]) ).
tcf(c_132,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_111,c_61]) ).
tcf(c_134,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_111,c_60]) ).
tcf(c_311,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,X0)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,X0) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_80,c_134]) ).
tcf(c_318,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_311,c_132]) ).
tcf(c_319,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_318,c_110]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR037+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/11.01 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.11/11.01 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/11.01 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/11.01 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/11.01 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/11.01 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/11.01 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/11.01 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 08:21:45 UTC 2026
% 0.11/11.01 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/11.01 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/11.05 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/11.05 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/11.06
% 0.14/11.06 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/11.06
% 0.14/11.06 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/11.07 % Proving...
% 0.14/11.91 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/11.91 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ iProver source info
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 0.14/11.91 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 0.14/11.91 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Parsing...
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.14/11.91 %
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 45 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e %
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Preprocessing...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 0.14/11.91 gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Proving...
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Problem Properties
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 %
% 0.14/11.91 % clauses 7
% 0.14/11.91 % conjectures 1
% 0.14/11.91 % EPR 7
% 0.14/11.91 % Horn 7
% 0.14/11.91 % unary 3
% 0.14/11.91 % binary 3
% 0.14/11.91 % lits 12
% 0.14/11.91 % lits eq 0
% 0.14/11.91 % fd_pure 0
% 0.14/11.91 % fd_pseudo 0
% 0.14/11.91 % fd_cond 0
% 0.14/11.91 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 0.14/11.91 % AC symbols 0
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Schedule EPR Horn non eq is on
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Option_epr_horn Time Limit: Unbounded
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------
% 0.14/11.91 % Current options:
% 0.14/11.91 % ------
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 %
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % ------ Proving...
% 0.14/11.91 %
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.14/11.91
% 0.14/11.91
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------