%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : SPASS---3.9 % Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : run_spass %d %s % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8042.1875MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 600s % DateTime : Fri Jul 15 23:24:28 EDT 2022 % Result : Theorem 1.74s 1.98s % Output : Refutation 1.74s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.03/0.11 % Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0. % 0.03/0.12 % Command : run_spass %d %s % 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu % 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB % 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 % 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600 % 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 07:30:46 EDT 2022 % 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime : % 1.74/1.98 % 1.74/1.98 SPASS V 3.9 % 1.74/1.98 SPASS beiseite: Proof found. % 1.74/1.98 % SZS status Theorem % 1.74/1.98 Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 1.74/1.98 SPASS derived 2235 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 3062 clauses. % 1.74/1.98 SPASS allocated 100392 KBytes. % 1.74/1.98 SPASS spent 0:00:01.60 on the problem. % 1.74/1.98 0:00:00.04 for the input. % 1.74/1.98 0:00:00.17 for the FLOTTER CNF translation. % 1.74/1.98 0:00:00.09 for inferences. % 1.74/1.98 0:00:00.00 for the backtracking. % 1.74/1.98 0:00:00.97 for the reduction. % 1.74/1.98 % 1.74/1.98 % 1.74/1.98 Here is a proof with depth 1, length 9 : % 1.74/1.98 % SZS output start Refutation % 1.74/1.98 1[0:Inp] || -> mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)*. % 1.74/1.98 268[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*l -> . % 1.74/1.98 467[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72). % 1.74/1.98 473[0:Inp] || mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)* -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24). % 1.74/1.98 1110[0:Inp] || geographicalsubregions(u,v)* geographicalsubregions(v,w)* -> geographicalsubregions(u,w)*. % 1.74/1.98 1137[0:MRR:473.0,1.0] || -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)*l. % 1.74/1.98 1138[0:MRR:467.0,1.0] || -> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*r. % 1.74/1.98 3879[0:NCh:1110.2,1110.0,268.0,1137.0] || geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)*r -> . % 1.74/1.98 3880[0:MRR:3879.0,1138.0] || -> . % 1.74/1.98 % SZS output end Refutation % 1.74/1.98 Formulae used in the proof : query87 ax1_188 ax1_276 ax1_1041 % 1.74/1.98 %------------------------------------------------------------------------------