%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:10:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.05s 6.31s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.05s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 8
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 47 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 41 ( 19 ~; 15 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 16 ( 0 sgn 16 !; 0 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f188,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_188) ).
fof(f276,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_276) ).
fof(f1041,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
& geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1041) ).
fof(f1132,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query87) ).
fof(f1133,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1132]) ).
fof(f1134,plain,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1133]) ).
fof(f1137,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1041]) ).
fof(f1138,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f1137]) ).
fof(f1139,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f188]) ).
fof(f1140,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f276]) ).
fof(f1143,plain,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1134]) ).
fof(f1144,plain,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1134]) ).
fof(f1146,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
| geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1138]) ).
fof(f1147,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1139]) ).
fof(f1148,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1140]) ).
tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1144]) ).
tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1143]) ).
tcf(c_52,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( geographicalsubregions(X2,X1)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X0)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1146]) ).
tcf(c_53,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1147]) ).
tcf(c_54,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1148]) ).
tcf(c_56,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_54,c_50,c_54]) ).
tcf(c_58,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_50,c_53]) ).
tcf(c_60,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( geographicalsubregions(X0,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_58]) ).
tcf(c_64,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_56]) ).
tcf(c_65,plain,
$false,
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_49]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR037+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/5.38 % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/5.38 % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 08:21:18 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/5.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.43
% 0.14/5.43 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.43
% 0.14/5.43 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.45 % Proving...
% 4.05/6.31 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.05/6.31 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.05/6.31 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.05/6.31 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Parsing...
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 4.05/6.31 %
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 3 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e %
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Preprocessing...% ------ preprocesses with Option_epr_horn
% 4.05/6.31 gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Proving...
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 %
% 4.05/6.31 % clauses 4
% 4.05/6.31 % conjectures 1
% 4.05/6.31 % EPR 4
% 4.05/6.31 % Horn 4
% 4.05/6.31 % unary 3
% 4.05/6.31 % binary 0
% 4.05/6.31 % lits 6
% 4.05/6.31 % lits eq 0
% 4.05/6.31 % fd_pure 0
% 4.05/6.31 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.05/6.31 % fd_cond 0
% 4.05/6.31 % fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 4.05/6.31 % AC symbols 0
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Schedule EPR Horn non eq is on
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ no equalities: superposition off
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Option_epr_horn Time Limit: Unbounded
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------
% 4.05/6.31 % Current options:
% 4.05/6.31 % ------
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 %
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % ------ Proving...
% 4.05/6.31 %
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.05/6.31
% 4.05/6.31
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------