%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:04 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.74s 0.80s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.74s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query137,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query137) ).
fof(ax2_1656,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1656) ).
fof(ax2_7881,axiom,
! [X15,X16,X17] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X16,X17)
& geographicalsubregions(X15,X16) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X15,X17) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7881) ).
fof(ax2_902,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_902) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query137]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1656])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X27,X28,X29] :
( geographicalsubregions(X27,X29)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X28,X29)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X27,X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7881])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_902])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR037+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.19/0.45 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.19/0.45 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.19/0.45 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.19/0.45 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.19/0.45 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.19/0.45 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.19/0.46 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:28:58 UTC 2026
% 0.19/0.46 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.23/0.52 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.23/0.52 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.74/0.80 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.74/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.74/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % new_bool_3 with pid 2005800 completed with status 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.74/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.74/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.74/0.80 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.74/0.80 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.74/0.80 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.74/0.80 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2005803 completed with status 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.74/0.80 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.74/0.80 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.74/0.80 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.74/0.80 % Search class: FHUNF-FFSM11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.74/0.80 % partial match(1): FHUNF-FFSF11-SFFFFFNN
% 0.74/0.80 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.74/0.80 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.74/0.80 % Preprocessing time : 0.007 s
% 0.74/0.80
% 0.74/0.80 % Proof found!
% 0.74/0.80 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.74/0.80 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.74/0.80 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.74/0.80 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7978
% 0.74/0.80 % Initial clauses : 29
% 0.74/0.80 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Initial clauses in saturation : 29
% 0.74/0.80 % Processed clauses : 38
% 0.74/0.80 % ...of these trivial : 3
% 0.74/0.80 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.74/0.80 % ...remaining for further processing : 34
% 0.74/0.80 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Generated clauses : 30
% 0.74/0.80 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 11
% 0.74/0.80 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Paramodulations : 30
% 0.74/0.80 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % NegExts : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Total rewrite steps : 19
% 0.74/0.80 % ...of those cached : 11
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.74/0.80 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.74/0.80 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.74/0.80 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.74/0.80 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.74/0.80 % Current number of processed clauses : 34
% 0.74/0.80 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 13
% 0.74/0.80 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.74/0.80 % Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.74/0.80 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.74/0.80 % ...number of literals in the above : 5
% 0.74/0.80 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21
% 0.74/0.80 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13
% 0.74/0.80 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.74/0.80 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.74/0.80 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.74/0.80 % Termbank termtop insertions : 52401
% 0.74/0.80 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31106
% 0.74/0.80
% 0.74/0.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.74/0.80 % User time : 0.027 s
% 0.74/0.80 % System time : 0.029 s
% 0.74/0.80 % Total time : 0.056 s
% 0.74/0.80 % Maximum resident set size: 20340 pages
% 0.74/0.80
% 0.74/0.80 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.74/0.80 % User time : 0.219 s
% 0.74/0.80 % System time : 0.045 s
% 0.74/0.80 % Total time : 0.263 s
% 0.74/0.80 % Maximum resident set size: 11264 pages
% 0.74/0.80 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------