↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : CSR037+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 07:06:43 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   18 (   7   ~;   5   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn   3   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax2_902,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax2_902) ).

fof(ax2_1656,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax2_1656) ).

fof(ax2_7881,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( geographicalsubregions(Y,Z)
        & geographicalsubregions(X,Y) )
     => geographicalsubregions(X,Z) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',ax2_7881) ).

fof(query137,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',query137) ).

fof(query137_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
     => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query137]) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax2_902]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax2_1656]) ).

cnf(c_55,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(A,C)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(B,C)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[ax2_7881]) ).

cnf(c_62,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[query137_neg]) ).

cnf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[query137_neg]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_91,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,A)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_55,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_89,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_91,c_68]) ).

cnf(c_90,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_89,c_63]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : CSR037+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.36  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Sep 27 00:07:16 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.07/0.37  % Process 203251 was started by sandbox2 on n014,
% 0.07/0.37  % Sun Sep 27 00:07:16 2026
% 0.07/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % SInE (scan): 33 to sos (tol 1.5x), 3 to usable (tol 2.0x), 7969 zapped, of 8005 axioms (depth 3).
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.12/0.46  % Length of proof is 13.
% 0.12/0.46  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.12/0.46  % Maximum clause weight is 9.000.
% 0.12/0.46  % Given clauses 41.
% 0.12/0.46  
% 0.12/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------