↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : CSR037+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 01:10:04 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.57s 1.19s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.57s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   47 (  22   ~;  18   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0 sgn  16   !;   0   ?;   4   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f902,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_902) ).

fof(f1656,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1656) ).

fof(f7881,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
        & geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) )
     => geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7881) ).

fof(f8006,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query137) ).

fof(f8007,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
     => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f8006]) ).

fof(f8015,plain,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    & ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f8007]) ).

fof(f8019,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
      | geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f7881]) ).

fof(f8020,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
      | geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f8019]) ).

fof(f8024,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1656]) ).

fof(f8034,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f902]) ).

fof(f8047,plain,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8015]) ).

fof(f8048,plain,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8015]) ).

fof(f8051,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1)
      | geographicalsubregions(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8020]) ).

fof(f8056,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8024]) ).

fof(f8067,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8034]) ).

tcf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8048]) ).

tcf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8047]) ).

tcf(c_53,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( geographicalsubregions(X2,X1)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X0)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8051]) ).

tcf(c_58,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8056]) ).

tcf(c_69,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8067]) ).

tcf(c_557,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( geographicalsubregions(X0,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X0,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_53]) ).

tcf(c_577,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_557]) ).

tcf(c_578,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_577,c_58,c_69,c_49,c_50]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR037+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.37  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.37  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 08:26:15 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.43  
% 0.09/0.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.44  % Proving...
% 1.57/1.19  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.57/1.19  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.57/1.19  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Parsing...
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 10 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % 
% 1.57/1.19  % clauses                               15
% 1.57/1.19  % conjectures                           1
% 1.57/1.19  % EPR                                   13
% 1.57/1.19  % Horn                                  15
% 1.57/1.19  % unary                                 5
% 1.57/1.19  % binary                                7
% 1.57/1.19  % lits                                  28
% 1.57/1.19  % lits eq                               0
% 1.57/1.19  % fd_pure                               0
% 1.57/1.19  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 1.57/1.19  % fd_cond                               0
% 1.57/1.19  % fd_pseudo_cond                        0
% 1.57/1.19  % AC symbols                            0
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ no equalities: superposition off 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ 
% 1.57/1.19  % Current options:
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % ------ Proving...
% 1.57/1.19  % 
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.57/1.19  
% 1.57/1.19  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------