↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : CSR037+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:14:16 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 29.36s 20.24s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 29.36s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (   5 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   28 (  12   ~;   9   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   5  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   4 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query187,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query187) ).

fof(ax3_10648,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_10648) ).

fof(ax3_44144,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17,X18] :
      ( ( geographicalsubregions(X16,X17)
        & geographicalsubregions(X17,X18) )
     => geographicalsubregions(X16,X18) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44144) ).

fof(ax3_12361,axiom,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
   => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_12361) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
     => geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query187]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_10648]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    & ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X48006,X48007,X48008] :
      ( ~ geographicalsubregions(X48006,X48007)
      | ~ geographicalsubregions(X48007,X48008)
      | geographicalsubregions(X48006,X48008) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44144])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
    | geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_12361]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(X1,X3)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
    | ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
    | ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : CSR037+4 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 16:28:08 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 29.36/20.24  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 29.36/20.24  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 29.36/20.24  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 29.36/20.24  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 29.36/20.27  % Total time : 18.752s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------