%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR037+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:38 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.25s 13.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 12.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query187,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query187) ).
fof(ax3_10648,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_10648) ).
fof(ax3_44144,axiom,
! [X16,X17,X18] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X16,X17)
& geographicalsubregions(X17,X18) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X16,X18) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44144) ).
fof(ax3_12361,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_12361) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query187]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_10648]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X19,X20,X21] :
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X19,X20)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X20,X21)
| geographicalsubregions(X19,X21) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_44144])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_12361]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : CSR037+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 08:11:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 12.25/13.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 12.25/13.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 12.25/13.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.631 s
% 12.25/13.44
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof found!
% 12.25/13.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.25/13.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object total steps : 18
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object formula steps : 9
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 12.25/13.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 5
% 12.25/13.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 12.25/13.44 # Parsed axioms : 44217
% 12.25/13.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44192
% 12.25/13.44 # Initial clauses : 26
% 12.25/13.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 26
% 12.25/13.44 # Processed clauses : 33
% 12.25/13.44 # ...of these trivial : 4
% 12.25/13.44 # ...subsumed : 3
% 12.25/13.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 26
% 12.25/13.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Generated clauses : 23
% 12.25/13.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 13
% 12.25/13.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Paramodulations : 23
% 12.25/13.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 26
% 12.25/13.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 11
% 12.25/13.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 12.25/13.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 12.25/13.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6
% 12.25/13.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 11
% 12.25/13.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 41
% 12.25/13.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 36
% 12.25/13.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 12.25/13.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 12.25/13.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 12.25/13.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 292933
% 12.25/13.44
% 12.25/13.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 12.25/13.44 # User time : 0.583 s
% 12.25/13.44 # System time : 0.049 s
% 12.25/13.44 # Total time : 0.632 s
% 12.25/13.44 # Maximum resident set size: 86384 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------