%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 02:46:48 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 11.21s 4.16s
% Output : CNFRefutation 11.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR)
% Number of literals : 23 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 7 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_28,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgw54i9b/input.p',i_0_28) ).
cnf(i_0_2534,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgw54i9b/input.p',i_0_2534) ).
cnf(i_0_2167,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgw54i9b/input.p',i_0_2167) ).
cnf(i_0_116,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgw54i9b/input.p',i_0_116) ).
cnf(i_0_2533,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-tgw54i9b/input.p',i_0_2533) ).
cnf(c_0_2540,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_28 ).
cnf(c_0_2541,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
i_0_2534 ).
cnf(c_0_2542,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X3,X2)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
i_0_2167 ).
cnf(c_0_2543,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2540,c_0_2541])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2544,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
i_0_116 ).
cnf(c_0_2545,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
i_0_2533 ).
cnf(c_0_2546,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2542,c_0_2543]) ).
cnf(c_0_2547,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_2544,c_0_2541])]) ).
cnf(c_0_2548,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_2545,c_0_2546]),c_0_2547])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : CSR037+4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 08:31:08 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.95/1.14 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.95/1.14 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.95/1.14 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.95/1.14 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 11.21/4.16 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 11.21/4.16 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 11.21/4.16 # Preprocessing time : 0.066 s
% 11.21/4.16
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof found!
% 11.21/4.16 # SZS status Theorem
% 11.21/4.16 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object clause conjectures : 3
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 11.21/4.16 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 11.21/4.16 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 11.21/4.16 # Parsed axioms : 2533
% 11.21/4.16 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Initial clauses : 2533
% 11.21/4.16 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Initial clauses in saturation : 2533
% 11.21/4.16 # Processed clauses : 2545
% 11.21/4.16 # ...of these trivial : 63
% 11.21/4.16 # ...subsumed : 133
% 11.21/4.16 # ...remaining for further processing : 2349
% 11.21/4.16 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 11.21/4.16 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Backward-subsumed : 6
% 11.21/4.16 # Backward-rewritten : 28
% 11.21/4.16 # Generated clauses : 4415
% 11.21/4.16 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 3588
% 11.21/4.16 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 21
% 11.21/4.16 # Paramodulations : 4413
% 11.21/4.16 # Factorizations : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Equation resolutions : 2
% 11.21/4.16 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Current number of processed clauses : 2313
% 11.21/4.16 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1049
% 11.21/4.16 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Negative unit clauses : 15
% 11.21/4.16 # Non-unit-clauses : 1249
% 11.21/4.16 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3481
% 11.21/4.16 # ...number of literals in the above : 6208
% 11.21/4.16 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Current number of archived clauses : 34
% 11.21/4.16 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 273481
% 11.21/4.16 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 251040
% 11.21/4.16 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 155
% 11.21/4.16 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12496
% 11.21/4.16 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2023
% 11.21/4.16 # BW rewrite match successes : 15
% 11.21/4.16 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Condensation successes : 0
% 11.21/4.16 # Termbank termtop insertions : 80484
% 11.21/4.16
% 11.21/4.16 # -------------------------------------------------
% 11.21/4.16 # User time : 0.193 s
% 11.21/4.16 # System time : 0.015 s
% 11.21/4.16 # Total time : 0.208 s
% 11.21/4.16 # ...preprocessing : 0.066 s
% 11.21/4.16 # ...main loop : 0.143 s
% 11.21/4.16 # Maximum resident set size: 19308 pages
% 11.21/4.16
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------