%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:05 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 30.27s 33.98s
% Output : CNFRefutation 30.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query237,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query237) ).
fof(ax4_171005,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_171005) ).
fof(ax4_538370,axiom,
! [X23,X27,X24] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X27,X24)
& geographicalsubregions(X23,X27) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X23,X24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_538370) ).
fof(ax4_25075,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_25075) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query237]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_171005])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X38,X39,X40] :
( geographicalsubregions(X38,X40)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X39,X40)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X38,X39) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_538370])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_25075])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR037+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/15.40 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/15.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/15.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/15.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/15.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/15.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/15.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.02/15.40 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:29:46 UTC 2026
% 0.02/15.40 % CPUTime :
% 0.02/15.40 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.02/15.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.02/15.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 30.27/33.98 % Version: 3.5.1
% 30.27/33.98 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 30.27/33.98 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % sh3 with pid 3076911 completed with status 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Result found by sh3
% 30.27/33.98 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 30.27/33.98 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 30.27/33.98 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 30.27/33.98 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 30.27/33.98 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 30.27/33.98 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting sh3 with 58s (1) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3076915 completed with status 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 30.27/33.98 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 30.27/33.98 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 30.27/33.98 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 30.27/33.98 % Search class: FHHNM-FSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 30.27/33.98 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 30.27/33.98 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 30.27/33.98 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 30.27/33.98 % Preprocessing time : 0.206 s
% 30.27/33.98
% 30.27/33.98 % Proof found!
% 30.27/33.98 % SZS status Theorem
% 30.27/33.98 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 30.27/33.98 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 30.27/33.98 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539681
% 30.27/33.98 % Initial clauses : 570
% 30.27/33.98 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Initial clauses in saturation : 570
% 30.27/33.98 % Processed clauses : 1489
% 30.27/33.98 % ...of these trivial : 65
% 30.27/33.98 % ...subsumed : 170
% 30.27/33.98 % ...remaining for further processing : 1254
% 30.27/33.98 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Backward-subsumed : 6
% 30.27/33.98 % Backward-rewritten : 30
% 30.27/33.98 % Generated clauses : 2937
% 30.27/33.98 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1950
% 30.27/33.98 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Paramodulations : 2937
% 30.27/33.98 % Factorizations : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % NegExts : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Total rewrite steps : 806
% 30.27/33.98 % ...of those cached : 574
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional check models : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 30.27/33.98 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 30.27/33.98 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 30.27/33.98 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 30.27/33.98 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 30.27/33.98 % Current number of processed clauses : 1218
% 30.27/33.98 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 686
% 30.27/33.98 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Negative unit clauses : 164
% 30.27/33.98 % Non-unit-clauses : 368
% 30.27/33.98 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 978
% 30.27/33.98 % ...number of literals in the above : 2032
% 30.27/33.98 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Current number of archived clauses : 36
% 30.27/33.98 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19369
% 30.27/33.98 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 17133
% 30.27/33.98 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 81
% 30.27/33.98 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 15999
% 30.27/33.98 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % BW rewrite match attempts : 48
% 30.27/33.98 % BW rewrite match successes : 34
% 30.27/33.98 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Condensation successes : 0
% 30.27/33.98 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3718303
% 30.27/33.98 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2173131
% 30.27/33.98
% 30.27/33.98 % -------------------------------------------------
% 30.27/33.98 % User time : 3.338 s
% 30.27/33.98 % System time : 1.460 s
% 30.27/33.98 % Total time : 4.799 s
% 30.27/33.98 % Maximum resident set size: 1242144 pages
% 30.27/33.98
% 30.27/33.98 % -------------------------------------------------
% 30.27/33.98 % User time : 16.216 s
% 30.27/33.98 % System time : 2.383 s
% 30.27/33.98 % Total time : 18.598 s
% 30.27/33.98 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 30.27/33.98 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------