%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR037+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.07s 87.73s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.07s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 18 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 28 ( 12 ~; 9 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 4 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn 6 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query287,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query287) ).
fof(ax5_1312400,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1312400) ).
fof(ax5_3337975,axiom,
! [X16,X18,X14] :
( ( geographicalsubregions(X18,X14)
& geographicalsubregions(X16,X18) )
=> geographicalsubregions(X16,X14) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_3337975) ).
fof(ax5_768291,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_768291) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query287]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1312400])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72)
& mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X44,X45,X46] :
( geographicalsubregions(X44,X46)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X45,X46)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X44,X45) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_3337975])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
( geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_768291])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X2,X3)
| ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,X2)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,X3) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l3_x15_y24,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24)
| geographicalsubregions(X1,c_georegion_l4_x45_y72) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
geographicalsubregions(c_georegion_l2_x5_y8,c_georegion_l3_x15_y24),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_9])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01 % Problem : CSR037+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.03/0.31 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.31 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.31 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.03/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:29:23 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.03/0.31 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.07/0.33 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.07/0.33 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/87.73 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.07/87.73 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/87.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting sh3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2570465 completed with status 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.07/87.73 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/87.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting sh3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/87.73 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.07/87.73 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.07/87.73 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 469 seconds (469 total)
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 43s (1) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 47s (1) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % new_ho_10_cnf2 with pid 2570690 completed with status 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Result found by new_ho_10_cnf2
% 0.07/87.73 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.07/87.73 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 242 seconds (1936 total)
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting sh3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 484s (2) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.07/87.73 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.07/87.73 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.07/87.73 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 469 seconds (469 total)
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 43s (1) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 47s (1) cores
% 0.07/87.73 % Preprocessing time : 1.280 s
% 0.07/87.73 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.07/87.73
% 0.07/87.73 % Proof found!
% 0.07/87.73 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/87.73 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.07/87.73 % Parsed axioms : 3341978
% 0.07/87.73 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 3326598
% 0.07/87.73 % Initial clauses : 15381
% 0.07/87.73 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.07/87.73 % Initial clauses in saturation : 15379
% 0.07/87.73 % Processed clauses : 27862
% 0.07/87.73 % ...of these trivial : 2202
% 0.07/87.73 % ...subsumed : 237
% 0.07/87.73 % ...remaining for further processing : 25423
% 0.07/87.73 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.07/87.73 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Backward-subsumed : 11
% 0.07/87.73 % Backward-rewritten : 842
% 0.07/87.73 % Generated clauses : 9209
% 0.07/87.73 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5972
% 0.07/87.73 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Paramodulations : 9208
% 0.07/87.73 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % NegExts : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.07/87.73 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Total rewrite steps : 8539
% 0.07/87.73 % ...of those cached : 5917
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/87.73 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/87.73 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.07/87.73 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.07/87.73 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.07/87.73 % Current number of processed clauses : 11130
% 0.07/87.73 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7359
% 0.07/87.73 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Negative unit clauses : 991
% 0.07/87.73 % Non-unit-clauses : 2780
% 0.07/87.73 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 6892
% 0.07/87.73 % ...number of literals in the above : 10064
% 0.07/87.73 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Current number of archived clauses : 14292
% 0.07/87.73 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1262940
% 0.07/87.73 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1050959
% 0.07/87.73 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 213
% 0.07/87.73 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1387938
% 0.07/87.73 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % BW rewrite match attempts : 23853
% 0.07/87.73 % BW rewrite match successes : 346
% 0.07/87.73 % Condensation attempts : 27941
% 0.07/87.73 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.07/87.73 % Termbank termtop insertions : 22565030
% 0.07/87.73 % Search garbage collected termcells : 10471851
% 0.07/87.73
% 0.07/87.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/87.73 % User time : 19.087 s
% 0.07/87.73 % System time : 6.114 s
% 0.07/87.73 % Total time : 25.201 s
% 0.07/87.73 % Maximum resident set size: 5020868 pages
% 0.07/87.73
% 0.07/87.73 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.07/87.73 % User time : 82.221 s
% 0.07/87.73 % System time : 12.354 s
% 0.07/87.73 % Total time : 94.576 s
% 0.07/87.73 % Maximum resident set size: 2273024 pages
% 0.07/87.73 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------