%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : CSR038+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:14:16 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.28s 1.72s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.28s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 17 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query38,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X13,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query38) ).
fof(just41,axiom,
! [X13] :
( isa(X13,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
=> tptpcol_16_7738(X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just41) ).
fof(just6,axiom,
! [X1] :
( isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
=> tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just6) ).
fof(just1,axiom,
! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
( ( isa(X1,X2)
& relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just1) ).
fof(just8,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just8) ).
fof(just7,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just7) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X13,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query38]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X307] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
& ( ~ tptp_8_968(X307,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X307) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X236] :
( ~ isa(X236,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X236) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just41])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
fof(c_0_11,plain,
! [X169] :
( ~ isa(X169,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X169,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X169) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just6])]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X165,X166,X167,X168] :
( ~ isa(X165,X166)
| ~ relationexistsall(X167,X168,X166)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X165,X167,X168,X166),X168) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just1])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[just7]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_15])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR038+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 16:35:08 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.28/1.72 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.28/1.72 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.28/1.72 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.28/1.72 % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------