%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : CSR038+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:14:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 3.95s 3.12s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.95s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 8 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 42 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 35 ( 15 ~; 11 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax1_64,axiom,
! [X7,X8,X3,X9] :
( ( isa(X7,X8)
& relationexistsall(X3,X9,X8) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,X3,X9,X8),X9) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_64) ).
fof(query88,conjecture,
? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X13,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X13) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query88) ).
fof(ax1_244,axiom,
! [X7] :
( isa(X7,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
=> tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_244) ).
fof(ax1_245,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_245) ).
fof(ax1_134,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_134) ).
fof(ax1_673,axiom,
! [X13] :
( isa(X13,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
=> tptpcol_16_7738(X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_673) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X1173,X1174,X1175,X1176] :
( ~ isa(X1173,X1174)
| ~ relationexistsall(X1175,X1176,X1174)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1173,X1175,X1176,X1174),X1176) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_64])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X13] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X13,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X13) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query88]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X1250] :
( ~ isa(X1250,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1250,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1250) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_244])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_245]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
! [X2265] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
& ( ~ tptp_8_968(X2265,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X2265) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax1_134]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X1575] :
( ~ isa(X1575,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X1575) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_673])]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.13 % Problem : CSR038+2 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.34 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.16/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 4 16:29:53 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 3.95/3.12 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 3.95/3.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 3.95/3.12 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.95/3.12 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 3.95/3.12 % Total time : 2.484s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------