%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem : CSR038+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 5 04:14:17 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 9.13s 6.91s
% Output : CNFRefutation 9.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 7 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 39 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 34 ( 15 ~; 10 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query138,conjecture,
? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X15,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X15) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query138) ).
fof(ax2_85,axiom,
! [X7] :
( isa(X7,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
=> tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X7) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_85) ).
fof(ax2_1129,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1129) ).
fof(ax2_7785,axiom,
! [X15] :
( isa(X15,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
=> tptpcol_16_7738(X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7785) ).
fof(ax2_453,axiom,
! [X7,X8,X9,X10] :
( ( isa(X7,X8)
& relationexistsall(X9,X10,X8) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X7,X9,X10,X8),X10) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_453) ).
fof(ax2_86,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_86) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X15] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptp_8_968(X15,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
& tptpcol_16_7738(X15) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query138]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X11964] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
& ( ~ tptp_8_968(X11964,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X11964) ) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X6016] :
( ~ isa(X6016,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X6016,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X6016) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_85])]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804)
| ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1)
| ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_1129]) ).
fof(c_0_12,plain,
! [X11597] :
( ~ isa(X11597,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X11597) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_7785])]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11])]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).
fof(c_0_15,plain,
! [X6117,X6118,X6119,X6120] :
( ~ isa(X6117,X6118)
| ~ relationexistsall(X6119,X6120,X6118)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X6117,X6119,X6120,X6118),X6120) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_453])]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ isa(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),c_tptpcol_16_7738),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax2_86]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_11])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : CSR038+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12 % Command : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.33 % DateTime : Mon May 4 16:30:58 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.34 % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 9.13/6.91 % Version : CSE_E---1.7
% 9.13/6.91 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 9.13/6.91 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 9.13/6.91 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 9.13/6.92 % Total time : 6.024s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------