%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR038+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:06 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 20.93s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 20 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 41 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 37 ( 16 ~; 12 |; 4 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 5 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn 13 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query238,conjecture,
? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptpcol_16_7738(X23)
& tptp_8_968(X23,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query238) ).
fof(ax4_59513,axiom,
! [X6] :
( isa(X6,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
=> tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_59513) ).
fof(ax4_470078,axiom,
! [X23] :
( isa(X23,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
=> tptpcol_16_7738(X23) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_470078) ).
fof(ax4_46691,axiom,
! [X6,X9,X10,X11] :
( ( relationexistsall(X10,X11,X9)
& isa(X6,X9) )
=> isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X6,X10,X11,X9),X11) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_46691) ).
fof(ax4_19965,axiom,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_19965) ).
fof(ax4_59514,axiom,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_59514) ).
fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X23] :
( mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt)
=> ( tptpcol_16_7738(X23)
& tptp_8_968(X23,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query238]) ).
fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
! [X30] :
( ( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X30)
| ~ tptp_8_968(X30,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) )
& mtvisible(c_knowledgefragmentd3mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).
fof(c_0_8,plain,
! [X35] :
( tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X35,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X35)
| ~ isa(X35,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_59513])])]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X31] :
( tptpcol_16_7738(X31)
| ~ isa(X31,c_tptpcol_16_7738) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_470078])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X47,X48,X49,X50] :
( isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X47,X49,X50,X48),X50)
| ~ relationexistsall(X49,X50,X48)
| ~ isa(X47,X48) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_46691])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( ~ tptpcol_16_7738(X1)
| ~ tptp_8_968(X1,c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))
| tptp_8_968(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
isa(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_19965]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_tptpcol_16_7738)
| tptpcol_16_7738(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ relationexistsall(X3,X4,X2)
| ~ isa(X1,X2)
| isa(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X3,X4,X2),X4) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(c_tptpnsubcollectionofwithrelationtotypefnissuingaprescriptionproductscorrectivelensprescription_2804,c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,X3)
| ~ relationexistsall(X2,c_tptpcol_16_7738,X3)
| tptpcol_16_7738(f_relationexistsallfn(X1,X2,c_tptpcol_16_7738,X3)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
relationexistsall(c_tptp_8_968,c_tptpcol_16_7738,f_subcollectionofwithrelationtotypefn(c_issuingaprescription,c_products,c_correctivelensprescription)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax4_59514]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05 % Problem : CSR038+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.41 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.41 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.41 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.41 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.42 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.42 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.42 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:39 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.42 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.42 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.49 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.49 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/20.93 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.22/20.93 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/20.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting sh3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % new_ho_10 with pid 2670124 completed with status 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.22/20.93 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/20.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/20.93 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/20.93 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/20.93 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/20.93 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting new_ho_10 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % new_ho_10 with pid 2670283 completed with status 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.22/20.93 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.22/20.93 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 287 seconds (2296 total)
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting new_ho_10 with 574s (2) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.22/20.93 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.22/20.93 % Search class: FHHSM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/20.93 % partial match(1): FHHNM-SSLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.22/20.93 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 570 seconds (570 total)
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % Starting new_ho_10 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.22/20.93 % Preprocessing time : 0.439 s
% 0.22/20.93 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.22/20.93
% 0.22/20.93 % Proof found!
% 0.22/20.93 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/20.93 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.22/20.93 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.22/20.93 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 539151
% 0.22/20.93 % Initial clauses : 1100
% 0.22/20.93 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.22/20.93 % Initial clauses in saturation : 1098
% 0.22/20.93 % Processed clauses : 3282
% 0.22/20.93 % ...of these trivial : 134
% 0.22/20.93 % ...subsumed : 176
% 0.22/20.93 % ...remaining for further processing : 2972
% 0.22/20.93 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.22/20.93 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Backward-subsumed : 8
% 0.22/20.93 % Backward-rewritten : 21
% 0.22/20.93 % Generated clauses : 4793
% 0.22/20.93 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4076
% 0.22/20.93 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.22/20.93 % Paramodulations : 4792
% 0.22/20.93 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % NegExts : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.22/20.93 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Total rewrite steps : 938
% 0.22/20.93 % ...of those cached : 671
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/20.93 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/20.93 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.22/20.93 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.22/20.93 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.22/20.93 % Current number of processed clauses : 2006
% 0.22/20.93 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 633
% 0.22/20.93 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Negative unit clauses : 78
% 0.22/20.93 % Non-unit-clauses : 1295
% 0.22/20.93 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2797
% 0.22/20.93 % ...number of literals in the above : 7930
% 0.22/20.93 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Current number of archived clauses : 965
% 0.22/20.93 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 238828
% 0.22/20.93 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 189226
% 0.22/20.93 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 180
% 0.22/20.93 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 23622
% 0.22/20.93 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % BW rewrite match attempts : 377
% 0.22/20.93 % BW rewrite match successes : 20
% 0.22/20.93 % Condensation attempts : 3311
% 0.22/20.93 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.22/20.93 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3780117
% 0.22/20.93 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2174297
% 0.22/20.93
% 0.22/20.93 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/20.93 % User time : 3.965 s
% 0.22/20.93 % System time : 1.731 s
% 0.22/20.93 % Total time : 5.696 s
% 0.22/20.93 % Maximum resident set size: 1242148 pages
% 0.22/20.93
% 0.22/20.93 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.22/20.93 % User time : 18.407 s
% 0.22/20.93 % System time : 2.922 s
% 0.22/20.93 % Total time : 21.329 s
% 0.22/20.93 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 0.22/20.93 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------