%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR041+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:18:09 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query41,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query41) ).
fof(just2,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> aspatialthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just2) ).
fof(just4,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just4) ).
fof(just41,axiom,
! [X7,X9] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X7,X9)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just41) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query41]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X17] :
( aspatialthing(X17)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X17) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just2])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| aspatialthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X18] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X18)
| ~ microtheory(X18) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[just4])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X72,X73] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X72,X73)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[just41]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR041+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:33:51 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.38 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.50 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2520093 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.50 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.50 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % new_bool_1 with pid 2520101 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/0.50 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.50 % Search class: FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.50 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.50 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.50 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.50
% 0.15/0.50 % Proof found!
% 0.15/0.50 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/0.50 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.50 % Parsed axioms : 73
% 0.15/0.50 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Initial clauses : 74
% 0.15/0.50 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Initial clauses in saturation : 74
% 0.15/0.50 % Processed clauses : 85
% 0.15/0.50 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % ...subsumed : 13
% 0.15/0.50 % ...remaining for further processing : 72
% 0.15/0.50 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/0.50 % Generated clauses : 2
% 0.15/0.50 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
% 0.15/0.50 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Paramodulations : 2
% 0.15/0.50 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.15/0.50 % ...of those cached : 1
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.50 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.26/0.50 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.50 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.50 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.50 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.50 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.50 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.26/0.50 % Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.26/0.50 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.26/0.50 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.26/0.50 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.50 % Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.26/0.50 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 50
% 0.26/0.50 % ...number of literals in the above : 96
% 0.26/0.50 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.26/0.50 % Current number of archived clauses : 61
% 0.26/0.50 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 278
% 0.26/0.50 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 266
% 0.26/0.50 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 13
% 0.26/0.50 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.26/0.50 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.26/0.50 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.26/0.50 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.26/0.50 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.26/0.50 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.26/0.50 % Termbank termtop insertions : 4145
% 0.26/0.50 % Search garbage collected termcells : 600
% 0.26/0.50
% 0.26/0.50 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.50 % User time : 0.011 s
% 0.26/0.50 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.26/0.50 % Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.26/0.50 % Maximum resident set size: 3700 pages
% 0.26/0.50
% 0.26/0.50 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.26/0.50 % User time : 0.026 s
% 0.26/0.50 % System time : 0.013 s
% 0.26/0.50 % Total time : 0.038 s
% 0.26/0.50 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.26/0.50 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------