%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR041+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.14s 0.46s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query91,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query91) ).
fof(ax1_366,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> aspatialthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_366) ).
fof(ax1_156,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_156) ).
fof(ax1_1089,axiom,
! [X5,X6] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X5,X6)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_1089) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query91]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X22] :
( aspatialthing(X22)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X22) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_366])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| aspatialthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X33] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X33)
| ~ microtheory(X33) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_156])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X27,X28] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X27,X28)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax1_1089]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR041+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:36:59 UTC 2026
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % new_bool_1 with pid 3376929 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.46 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46 % partial match(2): FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting G----_Z1410__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 361s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3376932 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.46 % Preprocessing class: FMLMSMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18C--_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 900s (3) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 600s (2) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.14/0.46 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.14/0.46 % Search class: FHUNM-FFSM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46 % partial match(2): FHUNM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.46 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 2 cores with 600 seconds (600 total)
% 0.14/0.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 61s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.46
% 0.14/0.46 % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.46 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.46 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.46 % Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.14/0.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1098
% 0.14/0.46 % Initial clauses : 35
% 0.14/0.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 35
% 0.14/0.46 % Processed clauses : 42
% 0.14/0.46 % ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.14/0.46 % ...subsumed : 3
% 0.14/0.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 38
% 0.14/0.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Generated clauses : 26
% 0.14/0.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 15
% 0.14/0.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Paramodulations : 26
% 0.14/0.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Total rewrite steps : 9
% 0.14/0.46 % ...of those cached : 5
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.14/0.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 38
% 0.14/0.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 15
% 0.14/0.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.14/0.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 21
% 0.14/0.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 8
% 0.14/0.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 18
% 0.14/0.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 26
% 0.14/0.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.14/0.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 3
% 0.14/0.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.14/0.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.14/0.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 9078
% 0.14/0.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 4928
% 0.14/0.46
% 0.14/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.46 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.46 % System time : 0.009 s
% 0.14/0.46 % Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.14/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.14/0.46
% 0.14/0.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.46 % User time : 0.032 s
% 0.14/0.46 % System time : 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.46 % Total time : 0.050 s
% 0.14/0.46 % Maximum resident set size: 5888 pages
% 0.14/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------