%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR041+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.47s 0.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 4 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax2_6495,axiom,
! [X15] :
( aspatialthing(X15)
=> isa(X15,c_aspatialthing) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_6495) ).
fof(ax2_1406,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> aspatialthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1406) ).
fof(ax2_3192,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3192) ).
fof(query141,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query141) ).
fof(ax2_7969,axiom,
! [X3,X4] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X3,X4)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7969) ).
fof(ax2_6494,axiom,
! [X15] :
( isa(X15,c_aspatialthing)
=> aspatialthing(X15) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_6494) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X27] :
( isa(X27,c_aspatialthing)
| ~ aspatialthing(X27) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_6495])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X23] :
( aspatialthing(X23)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X23) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1406])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ aspatialthing(X1)
| isa(X1,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| aspatialthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X31] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X31)
| ~ microtheory(X31) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3192])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query141]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| isa(X1,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X45,X46] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X45,X46)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax2_7969]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X26] :
( aspatialthing(X26)
| ~ isa(X26,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_6494])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| isa(X1,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_aspatialthing)
| aspatialthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
isa(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2),c_aspatialthing),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04 % Problem : CSR041+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.40 % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.40 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.40 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.40 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.40 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.40 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.40 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.40 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:31:29 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.41 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.41 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.18/0.50 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.50 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.47/0.86 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.47/0.86 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % new_bool_1 with pid 3078565 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.47/0.86 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.47/0.86 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.86 % Search class: FHHNS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.86 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.86 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % SubtermCWHack with pid 3078569 completed with status 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.47/0.86 % Preprocessing class: FMLLMMSLSSSNFFN.
% 0.47/0.86 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting G-E--_301_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.47/0.86 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.47/0.86 % Search class: FHHNS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.86 % partial match(1): FHHNM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.47/0.86 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.47/0.86 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.47/0.86 % Preprocessing time : 0.005 s
% 0.47/0.86
% 0.47/0.86 % Proof found!
% 0.47/0.86 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.47/0.86 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.47/0.86 % Parsed axioms : 8006
% 0.47/0.86 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 7935
% 0.47/0.86 % Initial clauses : 72
% 0.47/0.86 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Initial clauses in saturation : 72
% 0.47/0.86 % Processed clauses : 134
% 0.47/0.86 % ...of these trivial : 14
% 0.47/0.86 % ...subsumed : 11
% 0.47/0.86 % ...remaining for further processing : 109
% 0.47/0.86 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Generated clauses : 112
% 0.47/0.86 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 80
% 0.47/0.86 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Paramodulations : 112
% 0.47/0.86 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % NegExts : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Total rewrite steps : 41
% 0.47/0.86 % ...of those cached : 22
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.86 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.86 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.86 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.86 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.47/0.86 % Current number of processed clauses : 109
% 0.47/0.86 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 60
% 0.47/0.86 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Negative unit clauses : 8
% 0.47/0.86 % Non-unit-clauses : 41
% 0.47/0.86 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.47/0.86 % ...number of literals in the above : 38
% 0.47/0.86 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 219
% 0.47/0.86 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 201
% 0.47/0.86 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.47/0.86 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 79
% 0.47/0.86 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.47/0.86 % Termbank termtop insertions : 54515
% 0.47/0.86 % Search garbage collected termcells : 31202
% 0.47/0.86
% 0.47/0.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.86 % User time : 0.049 s
% 0.47/0.86 % System time : 0.038 s
% 0.47/0.86 % Total time : 0.087 s
% 0.47/0.86 % Maximum resident set size: 20084 pages
% 0.47/0.86
% 0.47/0.86 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.47/0.86 % User time : 0.272 s
% 0.47/0.86 % System time : 0.053 s
% 0.47/0.86 % Total time : 0.325 s
% 0.47/0.86 % Maximum resident set size: 11008 pages
% 0.47/0.86 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------