↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : CSR041+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.81s 1.99s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.81s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query141,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
   => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query141) ).

fof(ax2_1406,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
     => aspatialthing(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_1406) ).

fof(ax2_3192,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( microtheory(X1)
     => aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_3192) ).

fof(ax2_7969,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X3,X4)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+2.ax',ax2_7969) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
     => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query141]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
    & ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X2)
      | aspatialthing(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_1406])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( aspatialthing(X1)
    | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X2] :
      ( ~ microtheory(X2)
      | aspatialinformationstore(X2) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax2_3192])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X5,X6] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X5,X6)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax2_7969]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
    | ~ microtheory(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11  % Problem  : CSR041+3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun 11 03:41:50 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.81/1.99  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.81/1.99  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.81/1.99  # Preprocessing time       : 0.157 s
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof found!
% 0.81/1.99  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.81/1.99  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object total steps             : 15
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object clause steps            : 6
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object formula steps           : 9
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object conjectures             : 6
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 4
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object generating inferences   : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 2
% 0.81/1.99  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.81/1.99  # Parsed axioms                        : 8006
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7905
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses                      : 102
% 0.81/1.99  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 102
% 0.81/1.99  # Processed clauses                    : 103
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of these trivial                  : 12
% 0.81/1.99  # ...subsumed                          : 18
% 0.81/1.99  # ...remaining for further processing  : 73
% 0.81/1.99  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.81/1.99  # Generated clauses                    : 101
% 0.81/1.99  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 87
% 0.81/1.99  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Paramodulations                      : 101
% 0.81/1.99  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of processed clauses  : 72
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 26
% 0.81/1.99  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.81/1.99  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.81/1.99  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 44
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 86
% 0.81/1.99  # ...number of literals in the above   : 144
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.81/1.99  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 124
% 0.81/1.99  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 120
% 0.81/1.99  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 18
% 0.81/1.99  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 9
% 0.81/1.99  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 0.81/1.99  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.81/1.99  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 55074
% 0.81/1.99  
% 0.81/1.99  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.81/1.99  # User time                : 0.144 s
% 0.81/1.99  # System time              : 0.016 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Total time               : 0.159 s
% 0.81/1.99  # Maximum resident set size: 20004 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------