%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR041+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 1.84s 1.95s
% Output : CNFRefutation 1.84s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 40 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 30 ( 13 ~; 10 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 22 ( 4 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax3_43340,axiom,
! [X16] :
( aspatialthing(X16)
=> isa(X16,c_aspatialthing) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43340) ).
fof(ax3_3091,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> aspatialthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_3091) ).
fof(ax3_5173,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_5173) ).
fof(query191,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query191) ).
fof(ax3_44207,axiom,
! [X2,X3] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_44207) ).
fof(ax3_43339,axiom,
! [X16] :
( isa(X16,c_aspatialthing)
=> aspatialthing(X16) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+3.ax',ax3_43339) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X28] :
( isa(X28,c_aspatialthing)
| ~ aspatialthing(X28) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43340])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X24] :
( aspatialthing(X24)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X24) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_3091])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ aspatialthing(X1)
| isa(X1,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| aspatialthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X31] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X31)
| ~ microtheory(X31) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_5173])])]) ).
fof(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query191]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| isa(X1,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_14,plain,
! [X48,X49] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X48,X49)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax3_44207]) ).
fof(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).
fof(c_0_16,plain,
! [X27] :
( aspatialthing(X27)
| ~ isa(X27,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax3_43339])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| isa(X1,c_aspatialthing) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ isa(X1,c_aspatialthing)
| aspatialthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
isa(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2),c_aspatialthing),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : CSR041+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.55 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.55 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.55 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.55 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.55 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.55 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.55 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.55 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:32:00 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.55 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.55 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.60 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.60 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 1.84/1.95 % Version: 3.5.1
% 1.84/1.95 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.84/1.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % new_bool_1 with pid 1104038 completed with status 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Result found by new_bool_1
% 1.84/1.95 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.84/1.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.84/1.95 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.84/1.95 % Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.95 % partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.95 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1104040 completed with status 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 1.84/1.95 % Preprocessing class: FMLLLMSLSSSNFFN.
% 1.84/1.95 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 1.84/1.95 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.84/1.95 % Search class: FHHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.95 % partial match(1): FGHSS-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 1.84/1.95 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.84/1.95 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 1.84/1.95 % Preprocessing time : 0.010 s
% 1.84/1.95
% 1.84/1.95 % Proof found!
% 1.84/1.95 % SZS status Theorem
% 1.84/1.95 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.84/1.95 % Parsed axioms : 44217
% 1.84/1.95 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 44135
% 1.84/1.95 % Initial clauses : 83
% 1.84/1.95 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 1.84/1.95 % Initial clauses in saturation : 82
% 1.84/1.95 % Processed clauses : 128
% 1.84/1.95 % ...of these trivial : 17
% 1.84/1.95 % ...subsumed : 11
% 1.84/1.95 % ...remaining for further processing : 100
% 1.84/1.95 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 1.84/1.95 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Generated clauses : 103
% 1.84/1.95 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 73
% 1.84/1.95 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Paramodulations : 102
% 1.84/1.95 % Factorizations : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % NegExts : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 1.84/1.95 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Total rewrite steps : 41
% 1.84/1.95 % ...of those cached : 24
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional check models : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.95 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.95 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.95 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.95 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 1.84/1.95 % Current number of processed clauses : 99
% 1.84/1.95 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 52
% 1.84/1.95 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Negative unit clauses : 7
% 1.84/1.95 % Non-unit-clauses : 40
% 1.84/1.95 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 27
% 1.84/1.95 % ...number of literals in the above : 48
% 1.84/1.95 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 143
% 1.84/1.95 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 139
% 1.84/1.95 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 1.84/1.95 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 126
% 1.84/1.95 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Condensation successes : 0
% 1.84/1.95 % Termbank termtop insertions : 295716
% 1.84/1.95 % Search garbage collected termcells : 157860
% 1.84/1.95
% 1.84/1.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.84/1.95 % User time : 0.182 s
% 1.84/1.95 % System time : 0.099 s
% 1.84/1.95 % Total time : 0.281 s
% 1.84/1.95 % Maximum resident set size: 84020 pages
% 1.84/1.95
% 1.84/1.95 % -------------------------------------------------
% 1.84/1.95 % User time : 0.884 s
% 1.84/1.95 % System time : 0.172 s
% 1.84/1.95 % Total time : 1.056 s
% 1.84/1.95 % Maximum resident set size: 38144 pages
% 1.84/1.95 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------