%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR041+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:08 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.15s 19.06s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 24 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 17 ( 8 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 12 ( 2 sgn 8 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query241,conjecture,
( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query241) ).
fof(ax4_152478,axiom,
! [X1] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
=> aspatialthing(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_152478) ).
fof(ax4_100715,axiom,
! [X1] :
( microtheory(X1)
=> aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_100715) ).
fof(ax4_540206,axiom,
! [X2,X3] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X2,X3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+4.ax',ax4_540206) ).
fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
=> aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query241]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
( ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3))
& mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X35] :
( aspatialthing(X35)
| ~ aspatialinformationstore(X35) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_152478])])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
| aspatialthing(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
fof(c_0_9,plain,
! [X82] :
( aspatialinformationstore(X82)
| ~ microtheory(X82) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax4_100715])])]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X223,X224] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X223,X224)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax4_540206]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ microtheory(X1)
| aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR041+5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v3.5.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:34:07 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/19.06 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/19.06 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/19.06 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2521061 completed with status 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.15/19.06 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/19.06 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/19.06 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/19.06 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/19.06 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/19.06 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 574 seconds (574 total)
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % ho_unfolding_3 with pid 2521216 completed with status 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Result found by ho_unfolding_3
% 0.15/19.06 % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/19.06 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 288 seconds (2304 total)
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting new_ho_10 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting sh3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 576s (2) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/19.06 % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/19.06 % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/19.06 % partial match(1): FGHSM-SMLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/19.06 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 574 seconds (574 total)
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 52s (1) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 58s (1) cores
% 0.15/19.06 % Preprocessing time : 0.408 s
% 0.15/19.06 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/19.06
% 0.15/19.06 % Proof found!
% 0.15/19.06 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/19.06 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/19.06 % Parsed axioms : 540250
% 0.15/19.06 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 533844
% 0.15/19.06 % Initial clauses : 6407
% 0.15/19.06 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.15/19.06 % Initial clauses in saturation : 6405
% 0.15/19.06 % Processed clauses : 6632
% 0.15/19.06 % ...of these trivial : 374
% 0.15/19.06 % ...subsumed : 83
% 0.15/19.06 % ...remaining for further processing : 6175
% 0.15/19.06 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 1
% 0.15/19.06 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Backward-subsumed : 2
% 0.15/19.06 % Backward-rewritten : 45
% 0.15/19.06 % Generated clauses : 34
% 0.15/19.06 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 31
% 0.15/19.06 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Paramodulations : 33
% 0.15/19.06 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.15/19.06 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Total rewrite steps : 423
% 0.15/19.06 % ...of those cached : 37
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/19.06 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/19.06 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/19.06 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/19.06 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/19.06 % Current number of processed clauses : 226
% 0.15/19.06 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 131
% 0.15/19.06 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Negative unit clauses : 21
% 0.15/19.06 % Non-unit-clauses : 74
% 0.15/19.06 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 5705
% 0.15/19.06 % ...number of literals in the above : 6641
% 0.15/19.06 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Current number of archived clauses : 5948
% 0.15/19.06 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 125530
% 0.15/19.06 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 109521
% 0.15/19.06 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 83
% 0.15/19.06 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1530
% 0.15/19.06 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % BW rewrite match attempts : 67886
% 0.15/19.06 % BW rewrite match successes : 38
% 0.15/19.06 % Condensation attempts : 6632
% 0.15/19.06 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/19.06 % Termbank termtop insertions : 3873580
% 0.15/19.06 % Search garbage collected termcells : 2162177
% 0.15/19.06
% 0.15/19.06 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/19.06 % User time : 3.021 s
% 0.15/19.06 % System time : 1.478 s
% 0.15/19.06 % Total time : 4.500 s
% 0.15/19.06 % Maximum resident set size: 1242400 pages
% 0.15/19.06
% 0.15/19.06 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/19.06 % User time : 16.615 s
% 0.15/19.06 % System time : 2.956 s
% 0.15/19.06 % Total time : 19.572 s
% 0.15/19.06 % Maximum resident set size: 456704 pages
% 0.15/19.06 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------