↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : CSR041+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 138.34s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   6 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   24 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   17 (   8   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   8   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query291,conjecture,
    ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
   => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query291) ).

fof(ax5_1129761,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( aspatialinformationstore(X1)
     => aspatialthing(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1129761) ).

fof(ax5_551519,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( microtheory(X1)
     => aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_551519) ).

fof(ax5_1079496,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+5.ax',ax5_1079496) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt)
     => aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query291]) ).

fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3))
    & mtvisible(c_tptp_member2831_mt) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X36] :
      ( aspatialthing(X36)
      | ~ aspatialinformationstore(X36) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_1129761])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ aspatialinformationstore(X1)
    | aspatialthing(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X96] :
      ( aspatialinformationstore(X96)
      | ~ microtheory(X96) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax5_551519])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X50,X51] : microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X50,X51)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax5_1079496]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ microtheory(X1)
    | aspatialinformationstore(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_13])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : CSR041+6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/5.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/5.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:27:19 UTC 2026
% 0.09/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/5.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/138.34  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/138.34  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/138.34  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 203 seconds (1624 total)
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting new_ho_10 with 406s (2) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting sh3 with 406s (2) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 406s (2) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting new_ho_10_cnf2 with 406s (2) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % new_ho_10 with pid 2552661 completed with status 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.15/138.34  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/138.34  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 203 seconds (1624 total)
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting new_ho_10 with 406s (2) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/138.34  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/138.34  % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/138.34  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 387 seconds (387 total)
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting new_ho_10 with 39s (1) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % new_ho_10 with pid 2552697 completed with status 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Result found by new_ho_10
% 0.15/138.34  % Preprocessing class: FLLLLMLLSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/138.34  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 203 seconds (1624 total)
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting new_ho_10 with 406s (2) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/138.34  % SinE strategy is gf500_h_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.15/138.34  % Search class: FHHSM-SMLM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.15/138.34  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 2 cores with 387 seconds (387 total)
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 35s (1) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % Starting new_ho_10 with 39s (1) cores
% 0.15/138.34  % Preprocessing time       : 3.643 s
% 0.15/138.34  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/138.34  
% 0.15/138.34  % Proof found!
% 0.15/138.34  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/138.34  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/138.34  % Parsed axioms                        : 3341978
% 0.15/138.34  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3321977
% 0.15/138.34  % Initial clauses                      : 20002
% 0.15/138.34  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.15/138.34  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 20000
% 0.15/138.34  % Processed clauses                    : 21414
% 0.15/138.34  % ...of these trivial                  : 2209
% 0.15/138.34  % ...subsumed                          : 163
% 0.15/138.34  % ...remaining for further processing  : 19042
% 0.15/138.34  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.15/138.34  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Backward-subsumed                    : 3
% 0.15/138.34  % Backward-rewritten                   : 224
% 0.15/138.34  % Generated clauses                    : 378
% 0.15/138.34  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 327
% 0.15/138.34  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Paramodulations                      : 377
% 0.15/138.34  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.15/138.34  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2489
% 0.15/138.34  % ...of those cached                   : 109
% 0.15/138.34  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/138.34  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/138.34  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/138.34  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/138.34  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/138.34  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1408
% 0.15/138.34  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 860
% 0.15/138.34  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/138.34  %    Negative unit clauses             : 102
% 0.15/138.34  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 446
% 0.15/138.34  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 16319
% 0.15/138.34  % ...number of literals in the above   : 20449
% 0.15/138.34  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Current number of archived clauses   : 17633
% 0.15/138.34  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1153594
% 0.15/138.34  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1005154
% 0.15/138.34  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 158
% 0.15/138.34  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26920
% 0.15/138.34  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 200942
% 0.15/138.34  % BW rewrite match successes           : 215
% 0.15/138.34  % Condensation attempts                : 21414
% 0.15/138.34  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/138.34  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 22687916
% 0.15/138.34  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 10458605
% 0.15/138.34  
% 0.15/138.34  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/138.34  % User time                : 22.412 s
% 0.15/138.34  % System time              : 8.216 s
% 0.15/138.34  % Total time               : 30.628 s
% 0.15/138.34  % Maximum resident set size: 5021584 pages
% 0.15/138.34  
% 0.15/138.34  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/138.34  % User time                : 125.465 s
% 0.15/138.34  % System time              : 15.256 s
% 0.15/138.34  % Total time               : 140.721 s
% 0.15/138.34  % Maximum resident set size: 2273536 pages
% 0.15/138.34  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------