%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : CSR041-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 12:16:07 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 3 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 13 ( 13 usr; 5 con; 0-4 aty)
% Number of variables : 24 ( 12 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(just4,axiom,
ifeq3(microtheory(X1),true,aspatialinformationstore(X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just4) ).
cnf(just41,axiom,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just41) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom) ).
cnf(just2,axiom,
ifeq3(aspatialinformationstore(X1),true,aspatialthing(X1),true) = true,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',just2) ).
cnf(goal,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(query41_1,negated_conjecture,
ifeq2(aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),true,a,b) = b,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',query41_1) ).
cnf(ifeq_axiom_001,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ifeq_axiom_001) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
ifeq3(microtheory(X1),true,aspatialinformationstore(X1),true) = true,
just4 ).
cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
microtheory(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)) = true,
just41 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
ifeq3(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
ifeq3(aspatialinformationstore(X1),true,aspatialthing(X1),true) = true,
just2 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
aspatialinformationstore(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goal]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
ifeq2(aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(f_urlreferentfn(f_urlfn(s_http_wwwinformationblastcomtechnical_university_of_munichhtml)),c_translation_3)),true,a,b) = b,
query41_1 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
aspatialthing(f_contentmtofcdafromeventfn(X1,X2)) = true,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
ifeq2(X1,X1,X2,X3) = X2,
ifeq_axiom_001 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
a != b,
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : CSR041-10 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.38 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.38 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 14:26:12 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.45 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % new_bool_3 with pid 2551420 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.45 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2551425 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.10/0.45 % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.10/0.45 % Search class: FUUPM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.45 % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.10/0.45 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.45 % Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.45
% 0.10/0.45 % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.45 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.45 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.45 % Parsed axioms : 78
% 0.10/0.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 35
% 0.10/0.45 % Initial clauses : 43
% 0.10/0.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 43
% 0.10/0.45 % Processed clauses : 110
% 0.10/0.45 % ...of these trivial : 16
% 0.10/0.45 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 93
% 0.10/0.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Generated clauses : 219
% 0.10/0.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 92
% 0.10/0.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Paramodulations : 219
% 0.10/0.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Total rewrite steps : 311
% 0.10/0.45 % ...of those cached : 210
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 93
% 0.10/0.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 92
% 0.10/0.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.10/0.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 25
% 0.10/0.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 25
% 0.10/0.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 8
% 0.10/0.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.10/0.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 2921
% 0.10/0.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 105
% 0.10/0.45
% 0.10/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.45 % User time : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.45 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.45 % Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.10/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3680 pages
% 0.10/0.45
% 0.10/0.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.45 % User time : 0.007 s
% 0.10/0.45 % System time : 0.010 s
% 0.10/0.45 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.10/0.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------