%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Fri Jul 15 03:01:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.27s 1.45s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 13 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 22 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 16 ( 7 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 1 sgn 5 !; 2 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(query92,conjecture,
? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X5,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',query92) ).
fof(ax1_122,axiom,
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_122) ).
fof(ax1_900,axiom,
! [X13,X14] :
( borderson(X13,X14)
=> borderson(X14,X13) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax',ax1_900) ).
fof(c_0_3,negated_conjecture,
~ ? [X5] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
=> borderson(X5,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query92]) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
( ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
| borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65) ),
inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_122]) ).
fof(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
! [X6] :
( mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)
& ~ borderson(X6,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X15,X16] :
( ~ borderson(X15,X16)
| borderson(X16,X15) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_900])]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)
| ~ mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( borderson(X1,X2)
| ~ borderson(X2,X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ borderson(X1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 10 16:42:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.032 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.27/1.45 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 1116
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 17
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8050
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.029 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.032 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 5136 pages
% 0.27/1.45 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.27/1.45 # Preprocessing time : 0.050 s
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof found!
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.27/1.45 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object total steps : 13
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause steps : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object conjectures : 5
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object clause conjectures : 2
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object generating inferences : 1
% 0.27/1.45 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.27/1.45 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.27/1.45 # Parsed axioms : 1132
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses : 1133
% 0.27/1.45 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Initial clauses in saturation : 1133
% 0.27/1.45 # Processed clauses : 451
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # ...subsumed : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # ...remaining for further processing : 445
% 0.27/1.45 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Generated clauses : 96
% 0.27/1.45 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 83
% 0.27/1.45 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Paramodulations : 96
% 0.27/1.45 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of processed clauses : 445
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 272
% 0.27/1.45 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 169
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 765
% 0.27/1.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 1492
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 7141
% 0.27/1.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 6936
% 0.27/1.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.27/1.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 208
% 0.27/1.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.27/1.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 44961
% 0.27/1.45
% 0.27/1.45 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.27/1.45 # User time : 0.058 s
% 0.27/1.45 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Total time : 0.064 s
% 0.27/1.45 # Maximum resident set size: 8488 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------