↑ Up

PyRes---1.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : PyRes---1.5
% Problem  : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May  9 17:18:17 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 89.72s 89.96s
% Output   : Refutation 89.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : CSR042+2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.11/0.12  % Command  : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime : Thu May  9 01:33:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 89.72/89.96  % Version:  1.5
% 89.72/89.96  % SZS status Theorem
% 89.72/89.96  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 89.72/89.96  fof(query92,conjecture,(?[ARG1]:(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>borderson(ARG1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', query92)).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(c0,negated_conjecture,(~(?[ARG1]:(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>borderson(ARG1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64)))),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[query92])).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(c1,negated_conjecture,(![ARG1]:(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)&~borderson(ARG1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c0])).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(c2,negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)&(![ARG1]:~borderson(ARG1,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c1])).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(c4,negated_conjecture,(![X2]:(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)&~borderson(X2,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c3,negated_conjecture,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)&(![X2]:~borderson(X2,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c2])).])).
% 89.72/89.96  cnf(c6,negated_conjecture,~borderson(X1125,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c4])).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(ax1_900,axiom,(![X]:(![Y]:(borderson(X,Y)=>borderson(Y,X)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax', ax1_900)).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(c725,plain,(![X]:(![Y]:(~borderson(X,Y)|borderson(Y,X)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_900])).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(c726,plain,(![X343]:(![X344]:(~borderson(X343,X344)|borderson(X344,X343)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c725])).
% 89.72/89.96  cnf(c727,plain,~borderson(X1620,X1619)|borderson(X1619,X1620),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c726])).
% 89.72/89.96  cnf(c5,negated_conjecture,mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c4])).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(ax1_122,axiom,(mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)=>borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)),file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/CSR002+1.ax', ax1_122)).
% 89.72/89.96  fof(c2634,plain,(~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)|borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65)),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax1_122])).
% 89.72/89.96  cnf(c2635,plain,~mtvisible(c_tptpgeo_member7_mt)|borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c2634])).
% 89.72/89.96  cnf(c9556,plain,borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y64,c_georegion_l4_x27_y65),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c2635, c5])).
% 89.72/89.96  cnf(c16222,plain,borderson(c_georegion_l4_x27_y65,c_georegion_l4_x27_y64),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c9556, c727])).
% 89.72/89.96  cnf(c22070,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c16222, c6])).
% 89.72/89.96  % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 89.72/89.96  
% 89.72/89.96  % Initial clauses    : 1133
% 89.72/89.96  % Processed clauses  : 6872
% 89.72/89.96  % Factors computed   : 8
% 89.72/89.96  % Resolvents computed: 19208
% 89.72/89.96  % Tautologies deleted: 759
% 89.72/89.96  % Forward subsumed   : 7751
% 89.72/89.96  % Backward subsumed  : 16
% 89.72/89.96  % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 89.72/89.96  % User time          : 89.574 s
% 89.72/89.96  % System time        : 0.045 s
% 89.72/89.96  % Total time         : 89.619 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------